NGUAX vs. NBMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) and Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX).
NGUAX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Jun 1, 1950. NBMIX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Oct 20, 1998.
Performance
NGUAX vs. NBMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NGUAX vs. NBMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGUAX Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund | -11.52% | 14.38% | 23.80% | 35.98% | -24.47% | 27.43% | 34.56% | 36.69% | -7.16% | 25.28% |
NBMIX Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund | -7.63% | 9.87% | 25.90% | 10.01% | -24.43% | 4.16% | 42.83% | 34.55% | 4.80% | 28.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NGUAX achieves a -11.52% return, which is significantly lower than NBMIX's -7.63% return. Over the past 10 years, NGUAX has outperformed NBMIX with an annualized return of 14.11%, while NBMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.76% annualized return.
NGUAX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- YTD
- -11.52%
- 6M
- -11.20%
- 1Y
- 10.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 14.11%
NBMIX
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -11.06%
- YTD
- -7.63%
- 6M
- -6.92%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.64%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NGUAX vs. NBMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NGUAX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than NBMIX's 1.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NGUAX vs. NBMIX — Risk / Return Rank
NGUAX
NBMIX
NGUAX vs. NBMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) and Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NGUAX | NBMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 0.66 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.92 | 1.06 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 0.85 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.74 | 3.21 | -1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NGUAX | NBMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 0.66 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.07 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.53 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.37 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between NGUAX and NBMIX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NGUAX vs. NBMIX - Dividend Comparison
NGUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.04%, more than NBMIX's 7.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGUAX Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund | 14.04% | 12.43% | 6.01% | 4.30% | 6.62% | 10.92% | 7.60% | 6.21% | 11.21% | 6.87% | 13.11% | 12.82% |
NBMIX Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund | 7.29% | 6.74% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.71% | 1.06% | 3.98% | 23.77% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 5.92% |
Drawdowns
NGUAX vs. NBMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NGUAX drawdown since its inception was -78.07%, roughly equal to the maximum NBMIX drawdown of -78.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGUAX and NBMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NGUAX | NBMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.07% | -78.77% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.16% | -16.65% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.43% | -36.96% | +8.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.99% | -39.55% | +7.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.16% | -16.65% | +2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.98% | -34.72% | +2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 4.41% | -0.32% |
Volatility
NGUAX vs. NBMIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) is 4.85%, while Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that NGUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NGUAX | NBMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 9.24% | -4.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 18.88% | -8.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.57% | 25.49% | -5.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 24.60% | -6.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 24.20% | -6.00% |