NGHT vs. BHDG
NGHT (Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF) and BHDG (Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Nicholas. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.73, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.97% expense ratio.
Performance
NGHT vs. BHDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NGHT
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BHDG
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NGHT vs. BHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NGHT Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF | -15.90% |
BHDG Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF | -5.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between NGHT and BHDG is -0.73, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | -0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NGHT vs. BHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF (NGHT) and Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NGHT vs. BHDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NGHT drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, which is greater than BHDG's maximum drawdown of -15.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGHT and BHDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NGHT | BHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.53% | -15.06% | -6.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.99% | -8.95% | -11.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.22% | -8.29% | -0.93% |
Volatility
NGHT vs. BHDG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NGHT | BHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.93% | 27.31% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 27.31% | +2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 27.31% | +2.62% |
NGHT vs. BHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NGHT and BHDG have an expense ratio of 0.97%.
Dividends
NGHT vs. BHDG - Dividend Comparison
Neither NGHT nor BHDG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NGHT and BHDG have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.97% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NGHT and BHDG have the same expense ratio: 0.97% per year.
NGHT and BHDG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for NGHT and BHDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer