PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NGD.TO vs. VRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NGD.TO vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in New Gold Inc. (NGD.TO) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NGD.TO is traded in CAD, while VRT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VRT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


NGD.TO

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VRT

1D
1.86%
1M
-17.93%
YTD
90.78%
6M
90.53%
1Y
180.82%
3Y*
141.89%
5Y*
68.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NGD.TO vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NGD.TO
New Gold Inc.
1.67%233.15%86.98%44.36%-29.63%-32.50%143.48%9.52%-35.98%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
90.78%36.28%156.87%243.44%-41.78%33.73%65.34%7.91%5.37%

Correlation

The correlation between NGD.TO and VRT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NGD.TO:

CA$9.63B

VRT:

$118.76B

EPS

NGD.TO:

$1.09

VRT:

$3.99

PE Ratio

NGD.TO:

7.99

VRT:

75.98

PEG Ratio

NGD.TO:

0.01

VRT:

0.33

PS Ratio

NGD.TO:

4.65

VRT:

10.92

PB Ratio

NGD.TO:

3.61

VRT:

27.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

NGD.TO:

$1.49B

VRT:

$10.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NGD.TO:

$767.09M

VRT:

$3.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

NGD.TO:

$810.05M

VRT:

$2.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NGD.TO vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NGD.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NGD.TO vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Gold Inc. (NGD.TO) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NGD.TOVRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.36

NGD.TO vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NGD.TO vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NGD.TOVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.34%

Volatility

NGD.TO vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NGD.TOVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.95%

Dividends

NGD.TO vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

NGD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
NGD.TO
New Gold Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.07%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%

Financials

NGD.TO vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New Gold Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
523.32M
2.65B
(NGD.TO) Total Revenue
(VRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NGD.TO and VRT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NGD.TO and VRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer