NFXL vs. QTJL
NFXL (Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFXL returned -62.59% vs 20.52% for QTJL. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFXL charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
NFXL vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFXL achieves a -28.60% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.15% return.
NFXL
- 1D
- -5.81%
- 1M
- -19.33%
- YTD
- -28.60%
- 6M
- -48.60%
- 1Y
- -62.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFXL vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NFXL Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares | -28.60% | -11.98% | 50.97% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 7.15% | 21.07% | 6.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFXL and QTJL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024 | 0.41 |
The correlation between NFXL and QTJL shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NFXL vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NFXL
QTJL
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
NFXL
QTJL
Basic Materials
NFXL
-
QTJL
Consumer Cyclical
NFXL
-
QTJL
Consumer Defensive
NFXL
-
QTJL
Energy
NFXL
-
QTJL
Financial Services
NFXL
-
QTJL
Healthcare
NFXL
-
QTJL
Industrials
NFXL
-
QTJL
Real Estate
NFXL
-
QTJL
Technology
NFXL
-
QTJL
Utilities
NFXL
-
QTJL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFXL vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
NFXL
QTJL
NFXL vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFXL | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | 2.06 | -3.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | 2.93 | -4.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.42 | -0.61 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 3.08 | -3.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 16.23 | -17.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFXL | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | 2.06 | -3.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.52 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
NFXL vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFXL drawdown since its inception was -71.97%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFXL and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFXL | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.97% | -33.40% | -38.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.97% | -6.68% | -65.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.68% | -0.01% | -68.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.97% | -7.94% | -20.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.86% | 1.27% | +44.59% |
Volatility
NFXL vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) has a higher volatility of 14.02% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.31%. This indicates that NFXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFXL | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.02% | 0.31% | +13.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.06% | 7.61% | +43.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.27% | 10.01% | +56.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.51% | 20.42% | +49.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.51% | 20.42% | +49.09% |
NFXL vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFXL has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFXL vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
NFXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.17%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NFXL Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares | 11.17% | 7.97% | 0.59% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFXL and QTJL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFXL has higher volatility (14.02%) compared to QTJL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFXL dropped -71.97% vs QTJL's -33.40%.
On 1-year performance, QTJL leads with 20.52% vs -62.59% for NFXL. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 20.52% return vs -62.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for NFXL.
NFXL has the higher dividend yield at 11.17%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for NFXL and 0.79% for QTJL.
QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFXL and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer