NFXL vs. NRGU
NFXL (Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NFXL is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. Over the past year, NFXL returned -62.59% vs 156.99% for NRGU. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. NFXL charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.
Performance
NFXL vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFXL achieves a -28.60% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 129.31% return.
NFXL
- 1D
- -5.81%
- 1M
- -19.33%
- YTD
- -28.60%
- 6M
- -48.60%
- 1Y
- -62.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRGU
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- 129.31%
- 6M
- 97.01%
- 1Y
- 156.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFXL vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFXL Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares | -28.60% | -31.36% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 129.31% | -33.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFXL and NRGU is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | -0.02 |
NFXL vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NFXL
NRGU
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
NFXL
NRGU
-
Basic Materials
NFXL
-
NRGU
-
Consumer Cyclical
NFXL
-
NRGU
-
Consumer Defensive
NFXL
-
NRGU
-
Energy
NFXL
-
NRGU
Financial Services
NFXL
-
NRGU
-
Healthcare
NFXL
-
NRGU
-
Industrials
NFXL
-
NRGU
-
Real Estate
NFXL
-
NRGU
-
Technology
NFXL
-
NRGU
-
Utilities
NFXL
-
NRGU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFXL vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank
NFXL
NRGU
NFXL vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFXL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | 2.11 | -3.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | 2.43 | -3.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.30 | -0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 3.95 | -4.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 9.88 | -11.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFXL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | 2.11 | -3.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.45 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
NFXL vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFXL drawdown since its inception was -71.97%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFXL and NRGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFXL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.97% | -57.50% | -14.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.97% | -39.95% | -32.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.68% | -20.91% | -47.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.97% | -25.42% | -2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.86% | 15.96% | +29.90% |
Volatility
NFXL vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) is 14.02%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 31.63%. This indicates that NFXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFXL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.02% | 31.63% | -17.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.06% | 61.27% | -10.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.27% | 75.15% | -8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.51% | 89.15% | -19.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.51% | 89.15% | -19.64% |
NFXL vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFXL has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFXL vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison
NFXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.17%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NFXL Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares | 11.17% | 7.97% | 0.59% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFXL and NRGU have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRGU has higher volatility (31.63%) compared to NFXL (14.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFXL dropped -71.97% vs NRGU's -57.50%.
On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 156.99% vs -62.59% for NFXL. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NFXL has been the lower-risk option at 14.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 156.99% return vs -62.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for NFXL.
NFXL has the higher dividend yield at 11.17%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for NFXL and 0.95% for NRGU.
NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFXL and NRGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer