NFXL vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NFXL (Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. Both are actively managed. Their -0.15 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NFXL charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

NFXL vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFXL achieves a -46.98% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.

NFXL

• 1D: 4.63%
• 1M: -12.43%
• 6M: -31.11%
• YTD: -46.98%
• 1Y: -68.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -17.39%

LINT

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -46.62%
• 6M: 135.02%
• YTD: 266.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.84M	$20.02M	$35.16M
NFXL Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares	$17.34M	$25.07M	$22.41M

NFXL vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFXL Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares	-46.98%	-34.30%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	266.23%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NFXL and LINT is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	-0.15

NFXL vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NFXL	LINT
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NFXL vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NFXL

NFXL Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NFXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFXL Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NFXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NFXL Martin Ratio Rank: 1

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NFXL vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFXL	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.71	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	—	—

Drawdowns

NFXL vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFXL drawdown since its inception was -80.15%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFXL and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFXL	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.15%	-69.02%	-11.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.75%	-62.23%	-14.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.23%	-24.07%	-8.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.80%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NFXL	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.79%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.84%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.89%	169.02%	-99.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.95%	169.02%	-99.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.95%	169.02%	-99.07%

NFXL vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFXL has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFXL vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

NFXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.45%, more than LINT's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.74%	0.25%	0.00%
NFXL Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares	13.45%	7.97%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFXL and LINT in my portfolio?

NFXL and LINT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NFXL or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFXL or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for NFXL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFXL or LINT?

NFXL has the higher dividend yield at 13.45%, compared with 0.74% for LINT.

What is the main difference between NFXL and LINT?

Their fees differ too: 1.06% for NFXL and 0.97% for LINT.