PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFTY vs. GLIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFTY vs. GLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFTY achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than GLIN's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, NFTY has outperformed GLIN with an annualized return of 7.63%, while GLIN has yielded a comparatively lower 1.31% annualized return.


NFTY

1D
0.84%
1M
2.61%
6M
-3.38%
YTD
-4.28%
1Y
-0.22%
3Y*
6.73%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
7.63%
ALL TIME*
6.12%

GLIN

1D
2.25%
1M
-0.15%
6M
-0.05%
YTD
0.01%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
1.31%
ALL TIME*
-2.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$298.15K$380.51K$455.98K
$2.51M$1.71M$1.63M

NFTY vs. GLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-4.28%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%21.78%
GLIN
VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF
0.01%-5.47%15.64%36.13%-21.46%29.57%-0.29%-21.49%-37.41%66.53%

Correlation

The correlation between NFTY and GLIN is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2012

0.47

Over the past year, NFTY and GLIN have become more correlated (0.84) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

NFTY vs. GLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NFTY
GLIN

Financial Services

22.0%
34.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.2%
15.1%

Basic Materials

11.9%
8.2%

Healthcare

10.2%
8.7%

Technology

9.7%
4.1%

Industrials

8.1%
23.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
0.7%

Energy

7.9%
2.1%

Utilities

4.0%
3.6%

Communication Services

2.0%
5.1%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Financial Services

NFTY
22.0%
GLIN
34.9%

Consumer Cyclical

NFTY
16.2%
GLIN
15.1%

Basic Materials

NFTY
11.9%
GLIN
8.2%

Healthcare

NFTY
10.2%
GLIN
8.7%

Technology

NFTY
9.7%
GLIN
4.1%

Industrials

NFTY
8.1%
GLIN
23.3%

Consumer Defensive

NFTY
8.0%
GLIN
0.7%

Energy

NFTY
7.9%
GLIN
2.1%

Utilities

NFTY
4.0%
GLIN
3.6%

Communication Services

NFTY
2.0%
GLIN
5.1%

Real Estate

NFTY

-

GLIN
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFTY vs. GLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GLIN
GLIN Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NFTY vs. GLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFTYGLINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.06

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

0.29

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

1.02

-1.05

NFTY vs. GLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFTY Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the GLIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFTY and GLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFTY vs. GLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFTY drawdown since its inception was -47.67%, smaller than the maximum GLIN drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFTY and GLIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFTYGLINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.67%

-79.36%

+31.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.14%

-17.07%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.55%

-26.77%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.55%

-30.97%

+9.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.67%

-74.80%

+27.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.50%

-43.15%

+30.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-50.88%

+41.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

4.77%

+2.23%

Volatility

NFTY vs. GLIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) is 3.63%, while VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that NFTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFTYGLINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

5.33%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.22%

15.66%

-3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.87%

18.37%

-3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

18.38%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.65%

23.65%

-3.00%

NFTY vs. GLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIN's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFTY vs. GLIN - Dividend Comparison

NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than GLIN's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLIN
VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF
0.84%0.84%3.58%0.96%1.70%0.00%0.24%1.42%0.12%0.10%1.39%3.11%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.85%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFTY and GLIN have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLIN has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to NFTY (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFTY dropped -47.67% vs GLIN's -79.36%.

On 10-year performance, NFTY leads with 7.63% vs 1.31% for GLIN. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NFTY has performed better with a 7.63% return vs 1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for GLIN.

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.84% for GLIN.

NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index, while GLIN tracks MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFTY and 0.82% for GLIN.

GLIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFTY and GLIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer