PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLX vs. VRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NFLX vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLX achieves a -14.31% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 86.99% return.


NFLX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-7.59%
YTD
-14.31%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
-33.72%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
23.92%

VRT

1D
1.68%
1M
-19.50%
YTD
86.99%
6M
87.85%
1Y
173.26%
3Y*
138.33%
5Y*
63.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLX vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-14.31%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%-24.65%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
86.99%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%33.80%69.36%12.55%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLX and VRT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between NFLX and VRT has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NFLX:

$345.34B

VRT:

$118.76B

EPS

NFLX:

$3.09

VRT:

$3.99

PE Ratio

NFLX:

25.99

VRT:

75.98

PEG Ratio

NFLX:

1.03

VRT:

0.33

PS Ratio

NFLX:

7.41

VRT:

10.92

PB Ratio

NFLX:

11.09

VRT:

27.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

NFLX:

$46.89B

VRT:

$10.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NFLX:

$22.99B

VRT:

$3.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

NFLX:

$26.91B

VRT:

$2.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLX vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLX vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLXVRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.41

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

6.55

-7.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

17.79

-19.14

NFLX vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLX Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLX and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLX vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLX drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX and VRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLXVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.99%

-71.24%

-10.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.35%

-25.32%

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.35%

-61.28%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.95%

-71.24%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.01%

-19.50%

-20.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.91%

-16.23%

-8.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.19%

9.30%

+15.89%

Volatility

NFLX vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is 5.85%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 16.12%. This indicates that NFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLXVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

16.12%

-10.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.58%

45.82%

-21.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.05%

58.29%

-25.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.09%

61.88%

-18.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.49%

54.61%

-13.12%

Dividends

NFLX vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.07%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%

Financials

NFLX vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Netflix, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
12.25B
2.65B
(NFLX) Total Revenue
(VRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NFLX vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Netflix, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
51.9%
37.7%
Portfolio components
NFLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.36B and revenue of 12.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

NFLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

NFLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a net income of 5.28B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in a net margin of 43.1%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NFLX and VRT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRT has higher volatility (16.12%) compared to NFLX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLX dropped -81.99% vs VRT's -71.24%.

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLX and VRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer