NFLX vs. SMH
NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, NFLX returned 22.60%/yr vs 37.45%/yr for SMH. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NFLX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLX achieves a -20.87% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.29% return. Over the past 10 years, NFLX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 22.60%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.45% annualized return.
NFLX
- 1D
- 3.91%
- 1M
- -13.58%
- YTD
- -20.87%
- 6M
- -20.87%
- 1Y
- -42.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 22.60%
SMH
- 1D
- -5.40%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 72.29%
- 6M
- 72.29%
- 1Y
- 125.63%
- 3Y*
- 60.45%
- 5Y*
- 37.54%
- 10Y*
- 37.45%
NFLX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -20.87% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 65.11% | -51.05% | 11.41% | 67.11% | 20.89% | 39.44% | 55.06% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.29% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLX and SMH is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2002 | 0.38 |
The correlation between NFLX and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
NFLX
SMH
NFLX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.52 | -0.76 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 8.46 | -9.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.71 | 29.95 | -31.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLX drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, roughly equal to the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.99% | -84.96% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.34% | -14.93% | -30.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.06% | -35.74% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.95% | -45.30% | -30.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.95% | -45.30% | -30.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.60% | -7.24% | -37.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.95% | -40.98% | +16.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.01% | 4.21% | +20.80% |
Volatility
NFLX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is 10.85%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 20.63%. This indicates that NFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.85% | 20.63% | -9.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.36% | 30.45% | -4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.19% | 35.83% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.31% | 36.02% | +7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.52% | 33.05% | +8.47% |
Dividends
NFLX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLX and SMH have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (20.63%) compared to NFLX (10.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLX dropped -81.99% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLX and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer