NFLW vs. GOOP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and GOOP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLW returned -48.89% vs 74.04% for GOOP. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

NFLW vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -26.22% return, which is significantly lower than GOOP's 10.49% return.

NFLW

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -7.21%
• 6M: -20.56%
• YTD: -26.22%
• 1Y: -48.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GOOP

• 1D: -4.94%
• 1M: -5.73%
• 6M: 5.36%
• YTD: 10.49%
• 1Y: 74.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	-26.22%	-29.54%
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF	10.49%	64.20%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and GOOP is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

NFLW vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLW

NFLW Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 0

GOOP

GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 83
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLW	GOOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.20	2.48	-3.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.90	3.39	-5.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	1.43	-0.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	3.19	-4.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.59	10.16	-11.75

NFLW vs. GOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLW Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the GOOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLW and GOOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -55.10%, which is greater than GOOP's maximum drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and GOOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLW	GOOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.10%	-27.49%	-27.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.27%	-23.32%	-28.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.01%	-13.37%	-39.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.35%	-6.52%	-22.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.82%	7.31%	+23.51%

Volatility

NFLW vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) has a higher volatility of 13.72% compared to Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) at 11.45%. This indicates that NFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFLW	GOOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.72%	11.45%	+2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.76%	25.01%	+6.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.96%	30.04%	+10.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.30%	26.48%	+13.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.30%	26.48%	+13.82%

NFLW vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NFLW and GOOP have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

NFLW vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.21%, more than GOOP's 11.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF	11.97%	11.79%	13.73%	2.06%
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	82.21%	38.89%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLW and GOOP in my portfolio?

NFLW and GOOP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFLW or GOOP?

NFLW has higher volatility (13.72%) compared to GOOP (11.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLW dropped -55.10% vs GOOP's -27.49%.

Which ETF is better, NFLW or GOOP?

On 1-year performance, GOOP leads with 74.04% vs -48.89% for NFLW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GOOP has been the lower-risk option at 11.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFLW or GOOP?

Over the 1-year period, GOOP has performed better with a 74.04% return vs -48.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLW or GOOP?

NFLW and GOOP have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLW or GOOP?

NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 82.21%, compared with 11.97% for GOOP.

What is the main difference between NFLW and GOOP?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Kurv.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.