PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLW vs. GOOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLW vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -16.78% return, which is significantly lower than GOOP's 12.36% return.


NFLW

1D
-2.48%
1M
-12.48%
YTD
-16.78%
6M
-26.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOP

1D
-0.95%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
12.36%
6M
10.67%
1Y
93.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NFLW
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF
-16.78%-29.02%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
12.36%66.38%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and GOOP is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLW vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLW

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NFLW vs. GOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NFLWGOOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.05

1.51

-2.56

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than GOOP's maximum drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and GOOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLWGOOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.73%

-27.49%

-23.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.00%

-11.90%

-35.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.84%

-6.29%

-20.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.12%

Volatility

NFLW vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLWGOOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.34%

28.30%

+12.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.34%

25.91%

+14.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.34%

25.91%

+14.43%

NFLW vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NFLW and GOOP have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

NFLW vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 73.24%, more than GOOP's 12.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
12.25%11.79%13.73%2.06%
NFLW
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF
73.24%38.89%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLW and GOOP have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NFLW and GOOP have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 73.24%, compared with 12.25% for GOOP.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Kurv.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLW and GOOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer