NFLU vs. QTJL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLU returned -70.21% vs 11.97% for QTJL. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NFLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

NFLU vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -50.09% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 2.56% return.

NFLU

• 1D: -4.37%
• 1M: -16.63%
• 6M: -36.31%
• YTD: -50.09%
• 1Y: -70.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -20.46%

QTJL

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -1.97%
• 6M: 1.77%
• YTD: 2.56%
• 1Y: 11.97%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 9.06%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	$3.54M	$5.25M	$4.46M
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	$200.88K	$354.66K	$247.25K

NFLU vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	-50.09%	-12.47%	50.22%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	2.56%	21.07%	4.79%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLU and QTJL is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024	0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between NFLU and QTJL has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NFLU vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NFLU

NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 39
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 38
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NFLU vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLU	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.01	0.89	-1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.82	1.33	-3.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	1.18	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	1.23	-2.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	6.04	-7.48

NFLU vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLU Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLU and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFLU vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -80.45%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLU	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.45%	-33.40%	-47.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.14%	-8.48%	-68.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.43%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.21%	-4.62%	-73.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.00%	-7.74%	-24.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.81%	1.73%	+47.08%

Volatility

NFLU vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) has a higher volatility of 23.16% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 6.45%. This indicates that NFLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFLU	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.16%	6.45%	+16.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.99%	9.63%	+46.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.89%	11.72%	+58.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.64%	20.43%	+49.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.64%	20.30%	+49.34%

NFLU vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFLU vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither NFLU nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLU and QTJL in my portfolio?

NFLU and QTJL have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFLU or QTJL?

NFLU has higher volatility (23.16%) compared to QTJL (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLU dropped -80.45% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, NFLU or QTJL?

On 1-year performance, QTJL leads with 11.97% vs -70.21% for NFLU. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 6.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFLU or QTJL?

Over the 1-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 11.97% return vs -70.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLU or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLU or QTJL?

NFLU and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NFLU and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.