NFLU vs. CRMG
NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLU returned -73.54% vs -73.99% for CRMG. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.
Performance
NFLU vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -46.72% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -71.26% return.
NFLU
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -33.62%
- YTD
- -46.72%
- 6M
- -46.68%
- 1Y
- -73.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- 4.23%
- 1M
- -29.64%
- YTD
- -71.26%
- 6M
- -71.01%
- 1Y
- -73.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLU vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF | -46.72% | -11.56% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -71.26% | -0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLU and CRMG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLU vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
NFLU
CRMG
NFLU vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLU | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 0.79 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | -0.97 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | -1.70 | +0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLU vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, roughly equal to the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLU | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -79.83% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.74% | -76.80% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.74% | -78.97% | +2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.18% | -39.18% | +10.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.08% | 43.41% | +5.67% |
Volatility
NFLU vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) is 16.02%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) has a volatility of 32.53%. This indicates that NFLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLU | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.02% | 32.53% | -16.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.90% | 63.74% | -12.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.87% | 76.12% | -8.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.06% | 75.39% | -6.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.06% | 75.39% | -6.33% |
NFLU vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLU vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither NFLU nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLU and CRMG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRMG has higher volatility (32.53%) compared to NFLU (16.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLU dropped -76.74% vs CRMG's -79.83%.
On 1-year performance, NFLU leads with -73.54% vs -73.99% for CRMG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NFLU has been the lower-risk option at 16.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NFLU has performed better with a -73.54% return vs -73.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.
NFLU and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.75% for CRMG.
CRMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.97 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLU and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer