NFLT vs. CRDT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NFLT (Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF) and CRDT (Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLT returned 7.11% vs 2.41% for CRDT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

NFLT vs. CRDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) and Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLT achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than CRDT's 2.58% return.

NFLT

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 1.58%
• 1Y: 7.11%
• 3Y*: 7.38%
• 5Y*: 3.15%
• 10Y*: 4.13%

CRDT

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: 1.76%
• YTD: 2.58%
• 6M: 3.24%
• 1Y: 2.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLT vs. CRDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF	1.50%	8.77%	6.05%	5.46%
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF	2.58%	-0.67%	5.19%	5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLT and CRDT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023	0.20

NFLT vs. CRDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NFLT	CRDT
Utilities	2.7%	-
Financial Services	0.9%	0.5%
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	7.0%
Technology	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	-

Return for Risk

NFLT vs. CRDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLT

NFLT Risk / Return Rank: 57
NFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
NFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
NFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
NFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 70

CRDT

CRDT Risk / Return Rank: 13
CRDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CRDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
CRDT Omega Ratio Rank: 12
CRDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
CRDT Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLT vs. CRDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) and Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NFLT	CRDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	0.28	+1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	0.43	+2.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.06	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	0.34	+2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.00	1.01	+11.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NFLT vs. CRDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the CRDT Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLT and CRDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFLT	CRDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	0.28	+1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.59	+0.25

Drawdowns

NFLT vs. CRDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLT drawdown since its inception was -15.17%, which is greater than CRDT's maximum drawdown of -9.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLT and CRDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLT	CRDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.17%	-9.80%	-5.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.42%	-7.18%	+4.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-2.66%	+2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.10%	-2.32%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	2.40%	-1.85%

Volatility

NFLT vs. CRDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) is 1.19%, while Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that NFLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFLT	CRDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.19%	3.75%	-2.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.90%	7.64%	-4.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.01%	8.77%	-4.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.43%	7.05%	-2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.93%	7.05%	-2.12%

NFLT vs. CRDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NFLT and CRDT have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

NFLT vs. CRDT - Dividend Comparison

NFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, less than CRDT's 6.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF	6.29%	7.04%	7.29%	2.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF	5.50%	5.74%	5.76%	6.02%	4.16%	3.41%	3.63%	4.33%	4.81%	6.23%	5.30%	0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLT and CRDT in my portfolio?

NFLT and CRDT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFLT or CRDT?

CRDT has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to NFLT (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLT dropped -15.17% vs CRDT's -9.80%.

Which ETF is better, NFLT or CRDT?

On 1-year performance, NFLT leads with 7.11% vs 2.41% for CRDT. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, NFLT has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFLT or CRDT?

Over the 1-year period, NFLT has performed better with a 7.11% return vs 2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLT or CRDT?

NFLT and CRDT have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLT or CRDT?

CRDT has the higher dividend yield at 6.29%, compared with 5.50% for NFLT.

What is the main difference between NFLT and CRDT?

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Simplify.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NFLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.