NFLP vs. MSFY
NFLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF) and MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLP returned -37.65% vs -7.25% for MSFY. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLP charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for MSFY.
Performance
NFLP vs. MSFY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLP achieves a -18.61% return, which is significantly lower than MSFY's -13.99% return.
NFLP
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- -18.61%
- 6M
- -25.81%
- 1Y
- -37.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFY
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- -13.99%
- 6M
- -12.67%
- 1Y
- -7.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLP vs. MSFY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF | -18.61% | -1.54% | 53.24% | 7.25% |
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | -13.99% | 14.11% | 10.88% | 2.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLP and MSFY is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.38 |
The correlation between NFLP and MSFY shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLP vs. MSFY — Risk / Return Rank
NFLP
MSFY
NFLP vs. MSFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFLP | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.97 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.21 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | -0.47 | -1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLP | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.13 | -0.27 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.20 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
NFLP vs. MSFY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLP drawdown since its inception was -43.48%, which is greater than MSFY's maximum drawdown of -34.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLP and MSFY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLP | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.48% | -34.21% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.48% | -34.21% | -9.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.92% | -20.53% | -21.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.73% | -7.20% | -2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.52% | 15.40% | +9.12% |
Volatility
NFLP vs. MSFY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) is 8.15%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that NFLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLP | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 10.84% | -2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.72% | 25.02% | +2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.37% | 26.51% | +6.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 22.27% | +6.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 22.27% | +6.61% |
NFLP vs. MSFY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFY's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLP vs. MSFY - Dividend Comparison
NFLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.06%, more than MSFY's 24.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | 24.31% | 18.56% | 14.35% | 1.94% |
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF | 26.06% | 26.56% | 19.87% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLP and MSFY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFY has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to NFLP (8.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLP dropped -43.48% vs MSFY's -34.21%.
On 1-year performance, MSFY leads with -7.25% vs -37.65% for NFLP. On fees, NFLP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NFLP has been the lower-risk option at 8.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSFY has performed better with a -7.25% return vs -37.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFLP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for MSFY.
NFLP has the higher dividend yield at 26.06%, compared with 24.31% for MSFY.
Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLP and 1.00% for MSFY.
MSFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLP and MSFY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer