NFG vs. QYLG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NFG (National Fuel Gas Company) is a stock, while QYLG (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. Over the past 5 years, NFG returned 11.03%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for QYLG. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NFG vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFG achieves a -2.89% return, which is significantly lower than QYLG's 14.51% return.

NFG

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -5.77%
• YTD: -2.89%
• 6M: -4.80%
• 1Y: -3.20%
• 3Y*: 17.86%
• 5Y*: 11.03%
• 10Y*: 6.69%

QYLG

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 5.26%
• YTD: 14.51%
• 6M: 14.65%
• 1Y: 32.36%
• 3Y*: 21.27%
• 5Y*: 13.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFG vs. QYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NFG National Fuel Gas Company	-2.89%	35.31%	25.38%	-17.71%	1.87%	60.66%	2.37%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	14.51%	15.29%	22.02%	38.73%	-26.27%	18.29%	12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between NFG and QYLG is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2020	0.15

The correlation between NFG and QYLG shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NFG vs. QYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFG

NFG Risk / Return Rank: 33
NFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
NFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
NFG Omega Ratio Rank: 29
NFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
NFG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 82
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFG vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NFG	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.16	2.67	-2.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	3.63	-3.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.49	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	3.86	-4.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.35	17.59	-17.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NFG vs. QYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFG Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the QYLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFG and QYLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFG	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16	2.67	-2.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.73	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.83	-0.44

Drawdowns

NFG vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFG drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, which is greater than QYLG's maximum drawdown of -29.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFG and QYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFG	QYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.49%	-29.98%	-25.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.36%	-8.42%	-11.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.36%	-20.75%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.74%	-29.98%	-5.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.45%	-0.25%	-19.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.30%	-6.42%	-7.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.18%	1.84%	+7.34%

Volatility

NFG vs. QYLG - Volatility Comparison

National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) at 3.10%. This indicates that NFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFG	QYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.80%	3.10%	+2.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.18%	9.68%	+4.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.90%	12.16%	+7.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.24%	17.97%	+4.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.04%	17.92%	+6.12%

Dividends

NFG vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison

NFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than QYLG's 16.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NFG National Fuel Gas Company	2.77%	2.65%	3.36%	3.91%	2.97%	2.83%	4.30%	3.72%	3.30%	3.00%	2.84%	3.67%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	16.11%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFG and QYLG in my portfolio?

NFG and QYLG have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFG or QYLG?

NFG has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to QYLG (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFG dropped -55.49% vs QYLG's -29.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.