PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFFFX vs. FHKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFFFX vs. FHKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFFFX achieves a 15.07% return, which is significantly lower than FHKFX's 26.49% return.


NFFFX

1D
0.90%
1M
0.80%
6M
10.70%
YTD
15.07%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
10.95%

FHKFX

1D
0.47%
1M
-2.30%
6M
20.05%
YTD
26.49%
1Y
48.80%
3Y*
24.67%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFFFX vs. FHKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NFFFX
American Funds New World Fund
15.07%28.52%6.78%16.11%-21.86%4.98%25.17%27.89%-9.85%
FHKFX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund
26.49%38.51%5.42%12.10%-24.50%-4.15%17.85%9.64%-8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between NFFFX and FHKFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018

0.89

The correlation between NFFFX and FHKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFFFX vs. FHKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFFFX
NFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FHKFX
FHKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FHKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FHKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFFFX vs. FHKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFFFXFHKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

3.90

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

13.09

-4.86

NFFFX vs. FHKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFFFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the FHKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFFFX and FHKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFFFX vs. FHKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFFFX drawdown since its inception was -50.17%, which is greater than FHKFX's maximum drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFFFX and FHKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFFFXFHKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.17%

-45.47%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.01%

-12.54%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.05%

-16.71%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.48%

-40.45%

+6.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

-6.43%

+3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.77%

-17.07%

+7.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.73%

-0.41%

Volatility

NFFFX vs. FHKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX) is 7.33%, while Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) has a volatility of 10.23%. This indicates that NFFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFFFXFHKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

10.23%

-2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

20.10%

-5.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.77%

22.33%

-5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.84%

19.76%

-3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

20.05%

-3.83%

NFFFX vs. FHKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFFFX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FHKFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFFFX vs. FHKFX - Dividend Comparison

NFFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than FHKFX's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHKFX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund
1.88%2.38%2.86%2.43%2.56%3.46%1.38%2.28%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NFFFX
American Funds New World Fund
5.22%6.01%4.01%2.78%1.21%7.23%0.35%3.95%2.62%2.17%1.28%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFFFX and FHKFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHKFX has higher volatility (10.23%) compared to NFFFX (7.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFFFX dropped -50.17% vs FHKFX's -45.47%.

FHKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFFFX and FHKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer