PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFEPX vs. LBSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFEPX vs. LBSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Large Cap Growth Opportunity Fund (NFEPX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFEPX achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly higher than LBSAX's 8.67% return. Over the past 10 years, NFEPX has outperformed LBSAX with an annualized return of 15.64%, while LBSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.24% annualized return.


NFEPX

1D
-0.08%
1M
5.20%
YTD
10.68%
6M
9.00%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
15.64%

LBSAX

1D
0.72%
1M
1.34%
YTD
8.67%
6M
9.11%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFEPX vs. LBSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFEPX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opportunity Fund
10.68%15.54%24.80%31.61%-29.54%20.42%40.86%36.35%-4.14%27.96%
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
8.67%15.58%14.73%10.26%-5.19%25.97%7.48%27.84%-4.62%19.96%

Correlation

The correlation between NFEPX and LBSAX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2002

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between NFEPX and LBSAX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFEPX vs. LBSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFEPX
NFEPX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NFEPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFEPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFEPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NFEPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFEPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

LBSAX
LBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFEPX vs. LBSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Growth Opportunity Fund (NFEPX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NFEPXLBSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.86

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.26

14.51

-8.24

NFEPX vs. LBSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFEPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the LBSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFEPX and LBSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NFEPXLBSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.35

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.79

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.78

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.63

-0.13

Drawdowns

NFEPX vs. LBSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFEPX drawdown since its inception was -53.78%, which is greater than LBSAX's maximum drawdown of -47.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFEPX and LBSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFEPXLBSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.78%

-47.89%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.01%

-5.52%

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.49%

-13.03%

-11.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.26%

-17.16%

-19.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

-32.82%

-3.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

0.00%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

-5.25%

-8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

1.47%

+3.00%

Volatility

NFEPX vs. LBSAX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Large Cap Growth Opportunity Fund (NFEPX) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) at 2.45%. This indicates that NFEPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFEPXLBSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

2.45%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

6.86%

+5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.93%

9.09%

+6.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.54%

13.27%

+8.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.46%

15.69%

+5.77%

NFEPX vs. LBSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFEPX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than LBSAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFEPX vs. LBSAX - Dividend Comparison

NFEPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than LBSAX's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
4.74%5.11%5.78%4.72%3.62%2.65%1.52%2.68%7.36%3.83%3.60%8.01%
NFEPX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opportunity Fund
4.59%5.08%2.94%0.00%19.87%37.27%11.00%8.94%11.47%5.79%12.73%21.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFEPX and LBSAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFEPX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to LBSAX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFEPX dropped -53.78% vs LBSAX's -47.89%.

LBSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFEPX and LBSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer