NFEB vs. TWOX
NFEB (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February) and TWOX (iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. NFEB is passively managed, while TWOX is actively managed. Over the past year, NFEB returned 19.88% vs 16.12% for TWOX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TWOX.
Performance
NFEB vs. TWOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFEB achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly higher than TWOX's 2.15% return.
NFEB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 19.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TWOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFEB vs. TWOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFEB Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February | 8.35% | 12.69% |
TWOX iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF | 2.15% | 12.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFEB and TWOX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025 | 0.90 |
The correlation between NFEB and TWOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFEB vs. TWOX — Risk / Return Rank
NFEB
TWOX
NFEB vs. TWOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February (NFEB) and iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFEB | TWOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.32 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 1.70 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.20 | 8.04 | +8.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFEB | TWOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 1.55 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 0.67 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
NFEB vs. TWOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFEB drawdown since its inception was -13.27%, smaller than the maximum TWOX drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFEB and TWOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFEB | TWOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.27% | -19.35% | +6.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.05% | -9.51% | +3.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.02% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -2.64% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 2.01% | -0.78% |
Volatility
NFEB vs. TWOX - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February (NFEB) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX) at 0.49%. This indicates that NFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TWOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFEB | TWOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 0.49% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.77% | 8.25% | -2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.22% | 10.44% | -3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.95% | 16.78% | -4.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.95% | 16.78% | -4.83% |
NFEB vs. TWOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TWOX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFEB vs. TWOX - Dividend Comparison
NFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TWOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NFEB Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TWOX iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF | 0.55% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFEB and TWOX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFEB has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to TWOX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFEB dropped -13.27% vs TWOX's -19.35%.
On 1-year performance, NFEB leads with 19.88% vs 16.12% for TWOX. On fees, TWOX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TWOX has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NFEB has performed better with a 19.88% return vs 16.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TWOX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NFEB.
TWOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for NFEB.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NFEB and 0.50% for TWOX.
NFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFEB and TWOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer