PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEWFX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEWFX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New World Fund (NEWFX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEWFX achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly higher than COBYX's 8.92% return. Over the past 10 years, NEWFX has outperformed COBYX with an annualized return of 11.48%, while COBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.66% annualized return.


NEWFX

1D
0.53%
1M
5.56%
YTD
18.61%
6M
18.69%
1Y
36.61%
3Y*
19.46%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
11.48%

COBYX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
8.92%
6M
8.18%
1Y
14.37%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
4.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEWFX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEWFX
American Funds New World Fund
18.61%28.16%6.45%15.75%-22.08%4.69%24.79%27.51%-12.32%32.56%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
8.92%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-13.40%15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between NEWFX and COBYX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.57

The correlation between NEWFX and COBYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEWFX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEWFX
NEWFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NEWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NEWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEWFX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund (NEWFX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEWFXCOBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.23

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

1.69

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

5.43

+6.02

NEWFX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEWFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEWFX and COBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEWFX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEWFX drawdown since its inception was -56.71%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEWFX and COBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEWFXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.71%

-34.18%

-22.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-8.95%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

-16.29%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.68%

-17.10%

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.68%

-34.18%

+0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.74%

+2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.72%

-6.78%

-4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

2.79%

+0.46%

Volatility

NEWFX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds New World Fund (NEWFX) has a higher volatility of 7.60% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 2.98%. This indicates that NEWFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEWFXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.60%

2.98%

+4.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.28%

9.55%

+4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.22%

11.91%

+4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

13.99%

+1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

13.66%

+2.60%

NEWFX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEWFX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEWFX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

NEWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than COBYX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.08%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%0.00%
NEWFX
American Funds New World Fund
4.81%5.71%3.66%2.46%0.89%6.89%0.10%3.65%2.26%1.90%0.92%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEWFX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEWFX has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to COBYX (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEWFX dropped -56.71% vs COBYX's -34.18%.

NEWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEWFX and COBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer