NETL vs. VGSR
NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) and VGSR (Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. NETL is passively managed, while VGSR is actively managed. Over the past year, NETL returned 11.59% vs 10.24% for VGSR. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NETL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for VGSR.
Performance
NETL vs. VGSR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NETL achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than VGSR's 7.94% return.
NETL
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
VGSR
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 10.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NETL vs. VGSR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 10.34% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 4.23% |
VGSR Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF | 7.94% | 6.31% | 5.59% | 7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between NETL and VGSR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between NETL and VGSR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NETL vs. VGSR — Risk / Return Rank
NETL
VGSR
NETL vs. VGSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF (VGSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NETL | VGSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 1.06 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | 3.51 | +0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NETL | VGSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.81 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.73 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
NETL vs. VGSR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NETL drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, which is greater than VGSR's maximum drawdown of -18.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NETL and VGSR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NETL | VGSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.48% | -18.33% | -33.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -9.74% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -2.37% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.65% | -3.96% | -7.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.93% | -0.02% |
Volatility
NETL vs. VGSR - Volatility Comparison
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF (VGSR) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NETL | VGSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 3.81% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 9.59% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 12.71% | +0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 15.10% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 15.10% | +10.82% |
NETL vs. VGSR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NETL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VGSR's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
NETL vs. VGSR - Dividend Comparison
NETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than VGSR's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.83% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% |
VGSR Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF | 3.47% | 3.41% | 3.79% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NETL and VGSR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGSR has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to NETL (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NETL dropped -51.48% vs VGSR's -18.33%.
On 1-year performance, NETL leads with 11.59% vs 10.24% for VGSR. On fees, VGSR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, NETL has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NETL has performed better with a 11.59% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGSR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.
NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 3.47% for VGSR.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Vert. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NETL and 0.45% for VGSR.
NETL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NETL and VGSR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer