NETL vs. SRVR
NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both REIT funds - NETL tracks the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index while SRVR tracks the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NETL returned 1.33%/yr vs -0.81%/yr for SRVR. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
NETL vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NETL achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.79% return.
NETL
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 20.69%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- —
NETL vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 10.34% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 13.15% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 19.79% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 11.99% | 19.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between NETL and SRVR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NETL and SRVR has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
NETL vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NETL
SRVR
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
NETL
SRVR
Basic Materials
NETL
-
SRVR
Communication Services
NETL
-
SRVR
Consumer Cyclical
NETL
-
SRVR
-
Consumer Defensive
NETL
-
SRVR
-
Energy
NETL
-
SRVR
Financial Services
NETL
-
SRVR
Healthcare
NETL
-
SRVR
-
Industrials
NETL
-
SRVR
Technology
NETL
-
SRVR
Utilities
NETL
-
SRVR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NETL vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
NETL
SRVR
NETL vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NETL | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.13 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 0.76 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | 1.64 | +2.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NETL | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.67 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | -0.04 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.30 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
NETL vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NETL drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, which is greater than SRVR's maximum drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NETL and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NETL | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.48% | -40.99% | -10.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -14.78% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -18.34% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.74% | -40.99% | +10.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -12.28% | +8.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.65% | -15.27% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 6.83% | -3.92% |
Volatility
NETL vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) is 3.66%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that NETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NETL | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 5.47% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 13.12% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 16.72% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 19.71% | -1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 21.44% | +4.48% |
NETL vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NETL and SRVR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
NETL vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
NETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than SRVR's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.83% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.70% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NETL and SRVR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to NETL (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NETL dropped -51.48% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 5-year performance, NETL leads with 1.33% vs -0.81% for SRVR. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, NETL has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NETL has performed better with a 1.33% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NETL and SRVR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 2.70% for SRVR.
NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Pacer.
NETL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NETL and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer