NETL vs. RWR
NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) and RWR (SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - NETL tracks the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index while RWR tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NETL returned 1.33%/yr vs 4.15%/yr for RWR. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NETL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for RWR.
Performance
NETL vs. RWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NETL achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than RWR's 11.08% return.
NETL
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
RWR
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 11.08%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 15.44%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.15%
- 10Y*
- 5.15%
NETL vs. RWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 10.34% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 13.15% |
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 11.08% | 3.20% | 7.74% | 13.76% | -26.09% | 45.47% | -11.40% | 7.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between NETL and RWR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between NETL and RWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
NETL vs. RWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NETL
RWR
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
NETL
RWR
Basic Materials
NETL
-
RWR
-
Communication Services
NETL
-
RWR
-
Consumer Cyclical
NETL
-
RWR
-
Consumer Defensive
NETL
-
RWR
-
Energy
NETL
-
RWR
-
Financial Services
NETL
-
RWR
Healthcare
NETL
-
RWR
-
Industrials
NETL
-
RWR
-
Technology
NETL
-
RWR
-
Utilities
NETL
-
RWR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NETL vs. RWR — Risk / Return Rank
NETL
RWR
NETL vs. RWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NETL | RWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.20 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 1.93 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | 6.55 | -2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NETL | RWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.16 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.22 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.31 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
NETL vs. RWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NETL drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, smaller than the maximum RWR drawdown of -74.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NETL and RWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NETL | RWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.48% | -74.92% | +23.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -8.04% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -18.85% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.74% | -32.58% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -3.09% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.65% | -13.11% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.36% | +0.55% |
Volatility
NETL vs. RWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) is 3.66%, while SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that NETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NETL | RWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 4.09% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 9.51% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 13.39% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 19.01% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 21.51% | +4.41% |
NETL vs. RWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NETL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RWR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
NETL vs. RWR - Dividend Comparison
NETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than RWR's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.83% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 3.44% | 3.78% | 3.76% | 3.75% | 3.81% | 2.79% | 3.73% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 3.05% | 4.39% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NETL and RWR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWR has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to NETL (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NETL dropped -51.48% vs RWR's -74.92%.
On 5-year performance, RWR leads with 4.15% vs 1.33% for NETL. On fees, RWR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NETL has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RWR has performed better with a 4.15% return vs 1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.
NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 3.44% for RWR.
NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index, while RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NETL and 0.25% for RWR.
RWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NETL and RWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer