NETL vs. RINC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC).

NETL and RINC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NETL is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. It was launched on Mar 22, 2019. RINC is a passively managed fund by AXS that tracks the performance of the Gapstow Real Estate Income Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2023. Both NETL and RINC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

NETL vs. RINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NETL vs. RINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF	5.36%	6.05%	-1.08%	8.34%
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	0.00%	7.75%	-5.74%	1.71%

Returns By Period

NETL

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -7.51%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 6M: 2.83%
• 1Y: 3.68%
• 3Y*: 4.52%
• 5Y*: 2.35%
• 10Y*: —

RINC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NETL vs. RINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NETL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RINC's 0.89% expense ratio.

RINC

AXS Real Estate Income ETF

NETL

NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF

Return for Risk

NETL vs. RINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NETL

NETL Risk / Return Rank: 19
NETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
NETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
NETL Omega Ratio Rank: 17
NETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
NETL Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NETL vs. RINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NETL	RINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.43	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NETL	RINC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between NETL and RINC is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NETL vs. RINC - Dividend Comparison

NETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than RINC's 3.60% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF	4.98%	5.12%	5.08%	4.57%	4.47%	4.03%	3.98%	2.52%
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	3.60%	6.04%	10.85%	3.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	NETL	RINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.97%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.89%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NETL	RINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.88%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.05%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.16%	—	—