NETL vs. IYR
NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) and IYR (iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - NETL tracks the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index while IYR tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NETL returned 1.33%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for IYR. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NETL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYR.
Performance
NETL vs. IYR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NETL achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than IYR's 6.81% return.
NETL
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
IYR
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 6.81%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
NETL vs. IYR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 10.34% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 13.15% |
IYR iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF | 6.81% | 3.38% | 4.41% | 11.89% | -25.51% | 38.74% | -5.23% | 11.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between NETL and IYR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between NETL and IYR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
NETL vs. IYR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NETL
IYR
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
NETL
IYR
Basic Materials
NETL
-
IYR
Communication Services
NETL
-
IYR
Consumer Cyclical
NETL
-
IYR
-
Consumer Defensive
NETL
-
IYR
-
Energy
NETL
-
IYR
-
Financial Services
NETL
-
IYR
-
Healthcare
NETL
-
IYR
-
Industrials
NETL
-
IYR
-
Technology
NETL
-
IYR
-
Utilities
NETL
-
IYR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NETL vs. IYR — Risk / Return Rank
NETL
IYR
NETL vs. IYR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NETL | IYR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.12 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 0.99 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | 3.10 | +0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NETL | IYR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.64 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.11 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.32 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
NETL vs. IYR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NETL drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, smaller than the maximum IYR drawdown of -74.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NETL and IYR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NETL | IYR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.48% | -74.13% | +22.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -8.54% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -17.52% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.74% | -33.75% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -3.91% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.65% | -12.91% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.73% | +0.18% |
Volatility
NETL vs. IYR - Volatility Comparison
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NETL | IYR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 3.69% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 9.35% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 13.19% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 18.71% | -0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 20.31% | +5.61% |
NETL vs. IYR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NETL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IYR's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
NETL vs. IYR - Dividend Comparison
NETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than IYR's 2.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYR iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF | 2.25% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 2.75% | 2.92% | 2.06% | 2.58% | 3.05% | 3.53% | 3.73% | 4.41% | 3.92% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.83% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NETL and IYR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYR has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to NETL (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NETL dropped -51.48% vs IYR's -74.13%.
On 5-year performance, IYR leads with 2.02% vs 1.33% for NETL. On fees, IYR is cheaper at 0.42% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IYR has performed better with a 2.02% return vs 1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYR is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.
NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 2.25% for IYR.
NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index, while IYR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NETL and 0.42% for IYR.
NETL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NETL and IYR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer