NET vs. PULS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NET (Cloudflare, Inc.) is a stock, while PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM. Over the past 5 years, NET returned 26.45%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for PULS. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NET vs. PULS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cloudflare, Inc. (NET) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NET achieves a 36.26% return, which is significantly higher than PULS's 1.75% return.

NET

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 9.90%
• YTD: 36.26%
• 6M: 31.59%
• 1Y: 57.17%
• 3Y*: 56.63%
• 5Y*: 26.45%
• 10Y*: —

PULS

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.75%
• 6M: 2.12%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.59%
• 5Y*: 4.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NET vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NET Cloudflare, Inc.	36.26%	83.09%	29.33%	84.16%	-65.62%	73.05%	345.43%	-5.22%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.75%	4.97%	6.12%	6.26%	1.52%	0.48%	1.47%	0.92%

Correlation

The correlation between NET and PULS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2019	0.04

Return for Risk

NET vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NET

NET Risk / Return Rank: 69
NET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
NET Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
NET Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NET Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
NET Martin Ratio Rank: 69

PULS

PULS Risk / Return Rank: 100
PULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Omega Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NET vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cloudflare, Inc. (NET) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NET	PULS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	11.37	-10.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	32.77	-31.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	7.56	-6.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	52.23	-50.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.38	318.30	-314.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NET vs. PULS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NET Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the PULS Sharpe Ratio of 11.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NET and PULS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NET	PULS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	11.37	-10.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	5.92	-5.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	2.51	-1.78

Drawdowns

NET vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NET drawdown since its inception was -82.58%, which is greater than PULS's maximum drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NET and PULS.

Drawdown Indicators

	NET	PULS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.58%	-5.85%	-76.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.76%	-0.09%	-36.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.00%	-0.34%	-44.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.58%	-0.79%	-81.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	0.00%	-1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.62%	-0.09%	-37.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.95%	0.01%	+16.94%

Volatility

NET vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison

Cloudflare, Inc. (NET) has a higher volatility of 33.25% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.11%. This indicates that NET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NET	PULS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.25%	0.11%	+33.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.75%	0.30%	+52.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.14%	0.41%	+58.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.40%	0.70%	+67.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.76%	1.33%	+66.43%

Dividends

NET vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison

NET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NET Cloudflare, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.58%	4.78%	5.62%	5.48%	2.30%	1.19%	1.85%	2.69%	1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NET and PULS in my portfolio?

NET and PULS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NET or PULS?

NET has higher volatility (33.25%) compared to PULS (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NET dropped -82.58% vs PULS's -5.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.37 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.