PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEMIX vs. DRESX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEMIX vs. DRESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund (NEMIX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEMIX achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly lower than DRESX's 20.11% return. Over the past 10 years, NEMIX has underperformed DRESX with an annualized return of 7.79%, while DRESX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.


NEMIX

1D
1.09%
1M
0.56%
YTD
8.53%
6M
11.07%
1Y
32.26%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
7.79%

DRESX

1D
-0.47%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
20.11%
6M
21.52%
1Y
41.84%
3Y*
22.01%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEMIX vs. DRESX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEMIX
Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund
8.53%35.31%12.87%4.68%-23.86%-3.32%13.31%18.98%-17.32%41.62%
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
20.11%24.08%14.86%10.30%-21.17%15.93%33.56%33.70%-24.00%33.30%

Correlation

The correlation between NEMIX and DRESX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2011

0.75

The correlation between NEMIX and DRESX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEMIX vs. DRESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEMIX
NEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

DRESX
DRESX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEMIX vs. DRESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund (NEMIX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEMIXDRESXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.52

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

4.22

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

13.96

-5.46

NEMIX vs. DRESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the DRESX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEMIX and DRESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEMIXDRESXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.80

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.62

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.73

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.59

-0.20

Drawdowns

NEMIX vs. DRESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMIX drawdown since its inception was -41.28%, which is greater than DRESX's maximum drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMIX and DRESX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEMIXDRESXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.28%

-33.38%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-10.16%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.42%

-17.65%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.67%

-25.88%

-12.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.28%

-33.38%

-7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.02%

-5.25%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.17%

-9.91%

-4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

3.06%

+0.78%

Volatility

NEMIX vs. DRESX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund (NEMIX) is 4.44%, while Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that NEMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEMIXDRESXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

6.11%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

13.03%

-2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.94%

15.38%

-1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

14.71%

+1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

15.90%

+0.87%

NEMIX vs. DRESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEMIX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than DRESX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEMIX vs. DRESX - Dividend Comparison

NEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than DRESX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
1.87%2.25%0.68%1.09%0.00%0.04%0.65%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEMIX
Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund
0.02%0.02%0.14%1.34%0.44%1.06%0.36%1.80%1.00%0.63%0.52%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEMIX and DRESX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRESX has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to NEMIX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEMIX dropped -41.28% vs DRESX's -33.38%.

DRESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEMIX and DRESX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer