PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEMIX vs. NBGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEMIX vs. NBGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund (NEMIX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEMIX achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly higher than NBGIX's 5.98% return. Over the past 10 years, NEMIX has underperformed NBGIX with an annualized return of 7.67%, while NBGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.11% annualized return.


NEMIX

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
7.36%
6M
9.96%
1Y
31.02%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
7.67%

NBGIX

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
5.98%
6M
5.13%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
9.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEMIX vs. NBGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEMIX
Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund
7.36%35.31%12.87%4.68%-23.86%-3.32%13.31%18.98%-17.32%41.62%
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
5.98%-4.55%9.20%15.73%-19.35%18.25%25.07%29.68%-6.76%16.02%

Correlation

The correlation between NEMIX and NBGIX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2008

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between NEMIX and NBGIX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEMIX vs. NBGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEMIX
NEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
NEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

NBGIX
NBGIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NBGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEMIX vs. NBGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund (NEMIX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEMIXNBGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

0.51

+1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.14

0.89

+2.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.10

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

0.76

+1.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.20

2.07

+6.13

NEMIX vs. NBGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the NBGIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEMIX and NBGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEMIXNBGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

0.51

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.13

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.45

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.54

-0.15

Drawdowns

NEMIX vs. NBGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMIX drawdown since its inception was -41.28%, smaller than the maximum NBGIX drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMIX and NBGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEMIXNBGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.28%

-51.62%

+10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-10.75%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.42%

-27.48%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.67%

-28.27%

-10.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.28%

-34.53%

-6.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.04%

-9.59%

+3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.17%

-7.47%

-6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

3.97%

-0.14%

Volatility

NEMIX vs. NBGIX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund (NEMIX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) have volatilities of 4.29% and 4.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEMIXNBGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

4.09%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.78%

11.29%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

16.07%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

19.66%

-3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

20.23%

-3.46%

NEMIX vs. NBGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEMIX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than NBGIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEMIX vs. NBGIX - Dividend Comparison

NEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than NBGIX's 15.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
15.49%16.41%2.14%3.13%11.11%10.91%3.87%6.00%12.49%14.10%6.53%11.28%
NEMIX
Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund
0.02%0.02%0.14%1.34%0.44%1.06%0.36%1.80%1.00%0.63%0.52%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEMIX and NBGIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEMIX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to NBGIX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEMIX dropped -41.28% vs NBGIX's -51.62%.

NEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEMIX and NBGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer