PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRESX vs. EEMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRESX vs. EEMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRESX achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than EEMS's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, DRESX has outperformed EEMS with an annualized return of 8.92%, while EEMS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.78% annualized return.


DRESX

1D
1.70%
1M
-9.97%
6M
-5.73%
YTD
2.62%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
8.92%
ALL TIME*
7.46%

EEMS

1D
0.35%
1M
-6.86%
6M
-2.58%
YTD
3.97%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
7.78%
ALL TIME*
5.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.19M$5.05M$6.10M

DRESX vs. EEMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
2.62%24.08%14.86%10.30%-21.17%15.93%33.56%33.70%-24.00%33.30%
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
3.97%19.78%3.13%23.09%-19.12%18.12%19.47%11.25%-18.98%34.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DRESX and EEMS is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2011

0.68

The correlation between DRESX and EEMS shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.80 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRESX vs. EEMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DRESX
DRESX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMS
EEMS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DRESX vs. EEMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRESXEEMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.13

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

0.93

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

3.00

-0.25

DRESX vs. EEMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRESX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the EEMS Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRESX and EEMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRESX vs. EEMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRESX drawdown since its inception was -33.38%, smaller than the maximum EEMS drawdown of -48.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRESX and EEMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRESXEEMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.38%

-48.89%

+15.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.40%

-13.31%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-19.71%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

-27.07%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.38%

-48.89%

+15.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.05%

-11.48%

-7.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.91%

-10.46%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

4.11%

+1.41%

Volatility

DRESX vs. EEMS - Volatility Comparison

Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) at 6.47%. This indicates that DRESX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRESXEEMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.19%

6.47%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.63%

18.25%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.51%

19.85%

-1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.41%

16.69%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

18.17%

-1.94%

DRESX vs. EEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRESX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMS's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRESX vs. EEMS - Dividend Comparison

DRESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than EEMS's 3.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
2.19%2.25%0.68%1.09%0.00%0.04%0.65%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
3.07%3.09%2.60%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRESX and EEMS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRESX has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to EEMS (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRESX dropped -33.38% vs EEMS's -48.89%.

DRESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRESX and EEMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer