NEMG vs. MULL

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

NEMG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEMG achieves a -28.76% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 555.59% return.

NEMG

• 1D: -4.55%
• 1M: -15.30%
• 6M: -43.92%
• YTD: -28.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: -8.87%
• 1M: -18.69%
• 6M: 358.48%
• YTD: 555.59%
• 1Y: 2,617.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEMG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	-28.76%	22.87%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	555.59%	23.15%

Correlation

The correlation between NEMG and MULL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

NEMG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEMG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 98
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEMG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NEMG	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	17.43	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.03	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.63	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	49.98	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	156.39	—

Drawdowns

NEMG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMG drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMG and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEMG	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.31%	-72.29%	+13.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.31%	-45.21%	-13.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.88%	-20.84%	-5.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	17.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NEMG	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	67.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	124.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	100.38%	152.52%	-52.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	100.38%	144.81%	-44.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	100.38%	144.81%	-44.43%

NEMG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NEMG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.06%	0.39%
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEMG and MULL in my portfolio?

NEMG and MULL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NEMG or MULL?

On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NEMG or MULL?

NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NEMG or MULL?

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for NEMG.

What is the main difference between NEMG and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEMG and 1.50% for MULL.