NEMG vs. LRCU
NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.
Performance
NEMG vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEMG achieves a -28.76% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 176.12% return.
NEMG
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -15.30%
- 6M
- -43.92%
- YTD
- -28.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCU
- 1D
- -11.59%
- 1M
- -25.01%
- 6M
- 68.82%
- YTD
- 176.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEMG vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | -28.76% | 22.87% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 176.12% | 29.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEMG and LRCU is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEMG vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEMG vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEMG drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, which is greater than LRCU's maximum drawdown of -45.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMG and LRCU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEMG | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.31% | -45.07% | -13.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.31% | -44.32% | -13.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -10.22% | -15.66% |
Volatility
NEMG vs. LRCU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEMG | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.38% | 123.45% | -23.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.38% | 123.45% | -23.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.38% | 123.45% | -23.07% |
NEMG vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEMG vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison
Neither NEMG nor LRCU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NEMG and LRCU have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
NEMG and LRCU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEMG and 1.30% for LRCU.
Find the right allocation for NEMG and LRCU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer