NEMG vs. LRCU

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.

Performance

NEMG vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEMG achieves a -15.58% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 158.50% return.

NEMG

• 1D: -15.99%
• 1M: -26.54%
• YTD: -15.58%
• 6M: 2.22%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRCU

• 1D: -19.12%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 158.50%
• 6M: 195.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEMG vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	-15.58%	27.79%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	158.50%	30.65%

Correlation

The correlation between NEMG and LRCU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

NEMG vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NEMG	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	9.14	-9.00

Drawdowns

NEMG vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMG drawdown since its inception was -51.18%, which is greater than LRCU's maximum drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMG and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEMG	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.18%	-40.09%	-11.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.60%	-22.82%	-27.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.08%	-9.43%	-11.65%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NEMG	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.07%	111.50%	-9.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	102.07%	111.50%	-9.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	102.07%	111.50%	-9.43%

NEMG vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

NEMG vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

Neither NEMG nor LRCU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEMG and LRCU in my portfolio?

NEMG and LRCU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NEMG or LRCU?

On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NEMG or LRCU?

NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NEMG or LRCU?

NEMG and LRCU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NEMG and LRCU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEMG and 1.30% for LRCU.