NEMG vs. EDZ
NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) and EDZ (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NEMG is actively managed, while EDZ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.53, they often move in opposite directions. NEMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for EDZ.
Performance
NEMG vs. EDZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEMG achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than EDZ's -56.25% return.
NEMG
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDZ
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- -18.11%
- YTD
- -56.25%
- 6M
- -58.86%
- 1Y
- -74.18%
- 3Y*
- -48.04%
- 5Y*
- -24.82%
- 10Y*
- -36.41%
NEMG vs. EDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | 0.49% | 27.79% |
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | -56.25% | -5.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEMG and EDZ is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEMG vs. EDZ — Risk / Return Rank
NEMG
EDZ
NEMG vs. EDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEMG | EDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | -0.60 | +1.19 |
Drawdowns
NEMG vs. EDZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEMG drawdown since its inception was -51.18%, smaller than the maximum EDZ drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMG and EDZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEMG | EDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.18% | -99.99% | +48.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -75.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -89.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -92.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.20% | -99.99% | +58.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.86% | -97.73% | +76.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 44.50% | — |
Volatility
NEMG vs. EDZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEMG | EDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 51.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 99.99% | 59.51% | +40.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 99.99% | 57.00% | +42.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.99% | 60.97% | +39.02% |
NEMG vs. EDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EDZ's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEMG vs. EDZ - Dividend Comparison
NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | 10.10% | 6.58% | 4.87% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 1.67% | 0.68% |
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEMG and EDZ have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for EDZ.
EDZ has the higher dividend yield at 10.10%, compared with 0.00% for NEMG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEMG and 1.08% for EDZ.
Find the right allocation for NEMG and EDZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer