NEMG vs. ARCX
NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) and ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for ARCX.
Performance
NEMG vs. ARCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEMG achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than ARCX's -42.19% return.
NEMG
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARCX
- 1D
- -4.74%
- 1M
- 14.86%
- YTD
- -42.19%
- 6M
- -60.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEMG vs. ARCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | 0.49% | 27.79% |
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF | -42.19% | -4.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEMG and ARCX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEMG vs. ARCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEMG | ARCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | -0.61 | +1.20 |
Drawdowns
NEMG vs. ARCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEMG drawdown since its inception was -51.18%, smaller than the maximum ARCX drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMG and ARCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEMG | ARCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.18% | -91.51% | +40.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.20% | -86.86% | +45.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.86% | -64.50% | +43.64% |
Volatility
NEMG vs. ARCX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEMG | ARCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 99.99% | 138.55% | -38.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 99.99% | 138.55% | -38.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.99% | 138.55% | -38.56% |
NEMG vs. ARCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ARCX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEMG vs. ARCX - Dividend Comparison
Neither NEMG nor ARCX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NEMG and ARCX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for ARCX.
NEMG and ARCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEMG and 1.30% for ARCX.
Find the right allocation for NEMG and ARCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer