PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XEMD vs. VFV.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XEMD and VFV.TO is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

XEMD vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.26%
10.78%
XEMD
VFV.TO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XEMD:

2.28

VFV.TO:

2.61

Sortino Ratio

XEMD:

3.33

VFV.TO:

3.64

Omega Ratio

XEMD:

1.42

VFV.TO:

1.48

Calmar Ratio

XEMD:

4.40

VFV.TO:

4.06

Martin Ratio

XEMD:

15.05

VFV.TO:

18.41

Ulcer Index

XEMD:

0.76%

VFV.TO:

1.68%

Daily Std Dev

XEMD:

4.97%

VFV.TO:

11.82%

Max Drawdown

XEMD:

-10.01%

VFV.TO:

-27.43%

Current Drawdown

XEMD:

-0.47%

VFV.TO:

-0.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEMD achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly lower than VFV.TO's 3.48% return.


XEMD

YTD

2.47%

1M

1.11%

6M

3.80%

1Y

11.83%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VFV.TO

YTD

3.48%

1M

0.85%

6M

14.99%

1Y

31.34%

5Y*

16.20%

10Y*

14.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XEMD vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for XEMD: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%
Expense ratio chart for VFV.TO: current value at 0.09% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.09%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XEMD vs. VFV.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEMD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XEMD is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XEMD is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XEMD is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XEMD is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XEMD is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XEMD is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VFV.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VFV.TO is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VFV.TO is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VFV.TO is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VFV.TO is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VFV.TO is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VFV.TO is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XEMD vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XEMD, currently valued at 2.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.221.84
The chart of Sortino ratio for XEMD, currently valued at 3.23, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.232.51
The chart of Omega ratio for XEMD, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.411.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for XEMD, currently valued at 4.23, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.232.73
The chart of Martin ratio for XEMD, currently valued at 14.39, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0014.3911.30
XEMD
VFV.TO

The current XEMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMD and VFV.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.22
1.84
XEMD
VFV.TO

Dividends

XEMD vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than VFV.TO's 0.96% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
6.31%6.30%6.19%3.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.96%0.99%1.20%1.31%1.06%1.33%1.55%1.68%1.50%1.66%1.63%1.48%

Drawdowns

XEMD vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMD drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum VFV.TO drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD and VFV.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.47%
0
XEMD
VFV.TO

Volatility

XEMD vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) is 1.32%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that XEMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.32%
2.77%
XEMD
VFV.TO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab