NEMD vs. NBDS
NEMD (Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) and NBDS (Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while NBDS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. Both are actively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NEMD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for NBDS.
Performance
NEMD vs. NBDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEMD achieves a 3.47% return, which is significantly lower than NBDS's 9.49% return.
NEMD
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
NBDS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 15.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.98M | $1.83M | $2.43M | |
| $328.32K | $489.11K | $564.01K |
NEMD vs. NBDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 3.47% | 7.10% |
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF | 9.49% | 3.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEMD and NBDS is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEMD vs. NBDS — Risk / Return Rank
NEMD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NBDS
NEMD vs. NBDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEMD | NBDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEMD vs. NBDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEMD drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, smaller than the maximum NBDS drawdown of -29.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMD and NBDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEMD | NBDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -29.93% | +25.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -8.57% | +7.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -9.37% | +8.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.38% | — |
Volatility
NEMD vs. NBDS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEMD | NBDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.44% | 27.95% | -21.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 28.03% | -21.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 28.03% | -21.59% |
NEMD vs. NBDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEMD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than NBDS's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEMD vs. NBDS - Dividend Comparison
NEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than NBDS's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF | 0.35% | 0.38% |
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 5.81% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEMD and NBDS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBDS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBDS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NEMD.
NEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.81%, compared with 0.35% for NBDS.
NEMD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while NBDS is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NEMD and 0.55% for NBDS.
Find the right allocation for NEMD and NBDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer