PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEM vs. UI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEM vs. UI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Newmont Corporation (NEM) and Ubiquiti Inc. (UI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a -5.74% return, which is significantly lower than UI's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, NEM has underperformed UI with an annualized return of 10.07%, while UI has yielded a comparatively higher 29.81% annualized return.


NEM

1D
-2.14%
1M
0.44%
6M
-16.23%
YTD
-5.74%
1Y
52.51%
3Y*
33.89%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
10.07%
ALL TIME*
4.83%

UI

1D
4.37%
1M
3.75%
6M
1.17%
YTD
0.81%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
48.28%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
29.81%
ALL TIME*
27.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$671.95M$683.19M$803.32M
$45.54M$47.32M$74.80M

NEM vs. UI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEM
Newmont Corporation
-5.74%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%
UI
Ubiquiti Inc.
0.81%67.72%141.15%-48.23%-9.99%10.83%48.49%91.65%40.69%22.87%

Correlation

The correlation between NEM and UI is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2011

0.12

The correlation between NEM and UI shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NEM:

$98.74B

UI:

$33.68B

EPS

NEM:

$7.88

UI:

$15.56

PE Ratio

NEM:

11.89

UI:

35.78

PEG Ratio

NEM:

0.31

UI:

2.32

PS Ratio

NEM:

5.34

UI:

10.89

PB Ratio

NEM:

2.82

UI:

28.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEM:

$19.13B

UI:

$3.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEM:

$10.94B

UI:

$1.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

NEM:

$14.81B

UI:

$1.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEM vs. UI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

UI
UI Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
UI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
UI Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NEM vs. UI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Corporation (NEM) and Ubiquiti Inc. (UI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEMUIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.15

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

0.55

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

1.06

+2.56

NEM vs. UI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the UI Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEM and UI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEM vs. UI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, roughly equal to the maximum UI drawdown of -77.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and UI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEMUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.30%

-77.49%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.10%

-51.73%

+19.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.57%

-51.73%

+15.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.40%

-69.44%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.40%

-72.21%

+9.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.67%

-48.62%

+19.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.33%

-26.76%

-14.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.57%

27.01%

-12.44%

Volatility

NEM vs. UI - Volatility Comparison

Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a higher volatility of 11.58% compared to Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) at 9.02%. This indicates that NEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEMUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.58%

9.02%

+2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.40%

40.43%

-3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.45%

61.85%

-14.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.35%

48.76%

-10.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.74%

48.02%

-12.28%

Dividends

NEM vs. UI - Dividend Comparison

NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than UI's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.09%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%
UI
Ubiquiti Inc.
0.58%0.51%0.72%1.72%0.88%0.65%0.50%0.58%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NEM vs. UI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmont Corporation and Ubiquiti Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NEM and UI have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEM has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to UI (9.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEM dropped -81.30% vs UI's -77.49%.

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEM and UI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer