NEM vs. PINS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NEM (Newmont Corporation) and PINS (Pinterest, Inc.) are both stocks. NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while PINS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, NEM returned 10.51%/yr vs -21.59%/yr for PINS. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NEM vs. PINS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Newmont Corporation (NEM) and Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly higher than PINS's -21.94% return.

NEM

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: -7.88%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 2.58%
• 1Y: 74.95%
• 3Y*: 36.14%
• 5Y*: 10.51%
• 10Y*: 13.80%

PINS

• 1D: -6.00%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: -21.94%
• 6M: -22.24%
• 1Y: -40.28%
• 3Y*: -5.89%
• 5Y*: -21.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEM vs. PINS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NEM Newmont Corporation	0.82%	172.82%	-7.83%	-8.76%	-20.77%	7.40%	40.28%	28.57%
PINS Pinterest, Inc.	-21.94%	-10.72%	-21.71%	52.55%	-33.20%	-44.84%	253.54%	-21.52%

Correlation

The correlation between NEM and PINS is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019	0.06

The correlation between NEM and PINS shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS NEM : $6.34 PINS : $0.50
PE Ratio NEM : 15.82 PINS : 40.78
PEG Ratio NEM : 0.41 PINS : 0.21
PS Ratio NEM : 4.83 PINS : 3.12
Total Revenue (TTM) NEM : $17.23B PINS : $4.37B
Gross Profit (TTM) NEM : $8.97B PINS : $3.49B
EBITDA (TTM) NEM : $13.78B PINS : $351.59M

Return for Risk

NEM vs. PINS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEM

NEM Risk / Return Rank: 82
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 80
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 84

PINS

PINS Risk / Return Rank: 14
PINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
PINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
PINS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
PINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
PINS Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEM vs. PINS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Corporation (NEM) and Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NEM	PINS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	-0.82	+2.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	-0.96	+3.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.86	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	-0.67	+3.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.58	-1.15	+8.74

NEM vs. PINS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the PINS Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEM and PINS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NEM vs. PINS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, roughly equal to the maximum PINS drawdown of -82.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and PINS.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEM	PINS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.30%	-82.70%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.39%	-60.63%	+31.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.57%	-65.72%	+29.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.40%	-80.79%	+18.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.71%	-77.33%	+53.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.37%	-52.34%	+10.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.73%	35.29%	-24.56%

Volatility

NEM vs. PINS - Volatility Comparison

Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a higher volatility of 15.74% compared to Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) at 14.23%. This indicates that NEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PINS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NEM	PINS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.74%	14.23%	+1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.43%	38.04%	-0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.44%	49.60%	-2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.99%	55.83%	-17.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.67%	61.16%	-25.49%

Dividends

NEM vs. PINS - Dividend Comparison

NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while PINS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NEM Newmont Corporation	1.02%	1.00%	2.69%	3.87%	4.66%	3.55%	1.74%	3.31%	1.62%	0.67%	0.37%	0.56%
PINS Pinterest, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEM and PINS in my portfolio?

NEM and PINS have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NEM or PINS?

NEM has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to PINS (14.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEM dropped -81.30% vs PINS's -82.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.