PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEM vs. EONGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEM vs. EONGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Newmont Corporation (NEM) and E.ON SE ADR (EONGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than EONGY's 13.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NEM having a 13.46% annualized return and EONGY not far ahead at 14.02%.


NEM

1D
-0.72%
1M
-14.84%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
11.71%
1Y
91.07%
3Y*
36.63%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
13.46%

EONGY

1D
-0.86%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
13.49%
6M
19.62%
1Y
22.20%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
15.63%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEM vs. EONGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEM
Newmont Corporation
-0.43%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%
EONGY
E.ON SE ADR
13.49%68.77%-9.82%41.96%-25.33%30.17%7.27%11.88%-7.04%62.83%

Correlation

The correlation between NEM and EONGY is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2007

0.22

Fundamentals

EPS

NEM:

$6.34

EONGY:

$1.33

PE Ratio

NEM:

15.62

EONGY:

15.74

PEG Ratio

NEM:

0.41

EONGY:

0.09

PS Ratio

NEM:

4.77

EONGY:

0.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEM:

$17.23B

EONGY:

$75.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEM:

$8.97B

EONGY:

$15.73B

EBITDA (TTM)

NEM:

$13.78B

EONGY:

$9.86B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEM vs. EONGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

EONGY
EONGY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EONGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EONGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EONGY Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EONGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EONGY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEM vs. EONGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Corporation (NEM) and E.ON SE ADR (EONGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEMEONGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.18

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.04

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

4.80

+4.14

NEM vs. EONGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the EONGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEM and EONGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEMEONGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

0.97

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.64

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.56

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.00

+0.12

Drawdowns

NEM vs. EONGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, roughly equal to the maximum EONGY drawdown of -85.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and EONGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEMEONGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.30%

-85.09%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.25%

-10.93%

-16.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.57%

-29.37%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.40%

-46.78%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.40%

-46.78%

-15.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.65%

-26.87%

+2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.38%

-61.06%

+19.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.22%

4.64%

+5.58%

Volatility

NEM vs. EONGY - Volatility Comparison

Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a higher volatility of 14.19% compared to E.ON SE ADR (EONGY) at 7.77%. This indicates that NEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EONGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEMEONGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.19%

7.77%

+6.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.93%

18.04%

+18.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.87%

23.04%

+23.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.83%

24.56%

+13.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.59%

25.16%

+10.43%

Dividends

NEM vs. EONGY - Dividend Comparison

NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than EONGY's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EONGY
E.ON SE ADR
3.19%3.27%4.98%4.06%5.22%2.91%3.33%3.39%2.77%4.35%29.92%5.47%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.03%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

NEM vs. EONGY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmont Corporation and E.ON SE ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B202220232024202520260
22.18B
(NEM) Total Revenue
(EONGY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NEM and EONGY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEM has higher volatility (14.19%) compared to EONGY (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEM dropped -81.30% vs EONGY's -85.09%.

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEM and EONGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer