NEM vs. CHD
NEM (Newmont Corporation) and CHD (Church & Dwight Co., Inc.) are both stocks. NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while CHD operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, NEM returned 13.80%/yr vs 8.34%/yr for CHD. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NEM vs. CHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than CHD's 17.09% return. Over the past 10 years, NEM has outperformed CHD with an annualized return of 13.80%, while CHD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.34% annualized return.
NEM
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 74.95%
- 3Y*
- 36.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
CHD
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 17.09%
- 6M
- 16.04%
- 1Y
- 1.80%
- 3Y*
- 2.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
NEM vs. CHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEM Newmont Corporation | 0.82% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 17.09% | -18.91% | 11.96% | 18.72% | -20.41% | 18.89% | 25.46% | 8.36% | 33.23% | 15.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEM and CHD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 1986 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
NEM:
$6.34
CHD:
$3.02
NEM:
15.82
CHD:
32.30
NEM:
0.41
CHD:
3.53
NEM:
4.83
CHD:
3.82
NEM:
$17.23B
CHD:
$6.21B
NEM:
$8.97B
CHD:
$2.80B
NEM:
$13.78B
CHD:
$1.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEM vs. CHD — Risk / Return Rank
NEM
CHD
NEM vs. CHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Corporation (NEM) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEM | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.02 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | -0.01 | +2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | -0.03 | +7.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEM vs. CHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than CHD's maximum drawdown of -51.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and CHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEM | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -51.52% | -29.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.39% | -17.18% | -12.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.57% | -27.28% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.40% | -31.72% | -30.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.40% | -31.72% | -30.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.71% | -12.41% | -11.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.37% | -12.01% | -29.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.73% | 9.41% | +1.32% |
Volatility
NEM vs. CHD - Volatility Comparison
Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a higher volatility of 15.74% compared to Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) at 7.00%. This indicates that NEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEM | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.74% | 7.00% | +8.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.43% | 15.90% | +21.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.44% | 21.99% | +25.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.99% | 20.65% | +17.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.67% | 21.85% | +13.82% |
Dividends
NEM vs. CHD - Dividend Comparison
NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than CHD's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.08% | 1.15% | 1.30% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.61% | 1.58% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.02% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Financials
NEM vs. CHD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmont Corporation and Church & Dwight Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NEM and CHD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEM has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to CHD (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEM dropped -81.30% vs CHD's -51.52%.
NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEM and CHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer