NEHI vs. XBCI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NEHI (NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF) and XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Neos. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.98% expense ratio.

Performance

NEHI vs. XBCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NEHI

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 9.03%
• 6M: -18.71%
• YTD: -34.62%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

XBCI

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: 5.70%
• 6M: -21.55%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NEHI NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF	$1.32M	$1.23M	$2.12M
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	$3.66M	$3.51M	$5.20M

NEHI vs. XBCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NEHI NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF	-18.71%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	-21.55%

Correlation

The correlation between NEHI and XBCI is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.91

Return for Risk

NEHI vs. XBCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

NEHI vs. XBCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEHI drawdown since its inception was -50.12%, which is greater than XBCI's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEHI and XBCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEHI	XBCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.12%	-37.31%	-12.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.52%	-29.72%	-11.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.67%	-15.93%	-13.74%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NEHI	XBCI	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.49%	62.41%	-5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.49%	62.41%	-5.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.49%	62.41%	-5.92%

NEHI vs. XBCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NEHI and XBCI have an expense ratio of 0.98%.

Dividends

NEHI vs. XBCI - Dividend Comparison

NEHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.56%, more than XBCI's 25.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
NEHI NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF	30.56%	2.87%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	25.58%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEHI and XBCI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, NEHI and XBCI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, NEHI or XBCI?

Both ETFs have the same 0.98% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NEHI or XBCI?

NEHI and XBCI have the same expense ratio: 0.98% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NEHI or XBCI?

NEHI has the higher dividend yield at 30.56%, compared with 25.58% for XBCI.