PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEHI vs. ISCMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEHI vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEHI achieves a -36.78% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.


NEHI

1D
-1.50%
1M
-23.11%
YTD
-36.78%
6M
-38.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISCMF

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
22.87%
6M
22.87%
1Y
37.85%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEHI vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NEHI and ISCMF is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEHI vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEHI

ISCMF
ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEHI vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NEHI vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEHIISCMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.10

0.45

-1.55

Drawdowns

NEHI vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEHI drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEHI and ISCMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEHIISCMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.46%

-25.42%

-18.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.46%

-5.26%

-38.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.23%

-13.42%

-11.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

Volatility

NEHI vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEHIISCMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.19%

18.53%

+38.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.19%

14.37%

+42.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.19%

14.37%

+42.82%

NEHI vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEHI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEHI vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

NEHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.72%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


NEHI and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for NEHI.

NEHI has the higher dividend yield at 24.72%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

NEHI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for NEHI and 0.19% for ISCMF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEHI and ISCMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer