PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFZX vs. LFLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFZX vs. LFLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFZX achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than LFLIX's 3.03% return.


NEFZX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.57%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-0.14%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
7.08%
5Y*
2.03%
10Y*
3.15%

LFLIX

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.38%
YTD
3.03%
6M
3.59%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEFZX vs. LFLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFZX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund
-0.38%8.92%7.05%8.02%-12.82%3.85%1.15%10.84%-3.00%7.22%
LFLIX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund
3.03%8.82%2.95%9.57%-10.87%1.05%15.00%10.84%-2.07%4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFZX and LFLIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.65

The correlation between NEFZX and LFLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFZX vs. LFLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEFZX
NEFZX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
NEFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

LFLIX
LFLIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
LFLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
LFLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEFZX vs. LFLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEFZXLFLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.40

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

3.10

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

10.72

-6.54

NEFZX vs. LFLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the LFLIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFZX and LFLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEFZX vs. LFLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFZX drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, which is greater than LFLIX's maximum drawdown of -16.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFZX and LFLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFZXLFLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.07%

-16.73%

-15.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.17%

-2.72%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.88%

-7.54%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

-16.73%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-0.52%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-2.85%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

0.78%

+0.45%

Volatility

NEFZX vs. LFLIX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) has a higher volatility of 1.59% compared to BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX) at 1.42%. This indicates that NEFZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFZXLFLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

1.42%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.59%

3.47%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53%

4.13%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.60%

5.74%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.28%

5.09%

+0.19%

NEFZX vs. LFLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFZX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LFLIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFZX vs. LFLIX - Dividend Comparison

NEFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than LFLIX's 6.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFLIX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund
6.93%6.67%8.94%5.36%3.28%2.90%3.62%6.04%3.67%3.06%0.00%0.00%
NEFZX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund
3.97%3.83%5.60%5.37%6.34%2.64%4.20%3.51%4.28%4.06%4.76%10.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFZX and LFLIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEFZX has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to LFLIX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFZX dropped -32.07% vs LFLIX's -16.73%.

LFLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFZX and LFLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer