PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFZX vs. LSIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFZX vs. LSIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFZX achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than LSIIX's 0.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NEFZX having a 3.24% annualized return and LSIIX not far behind at 3.15%.


NEFZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.57%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
3.24%

LSIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.94%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.56%
1Y
3.04%
3Y*
4.53%
5Y*
0.85%
10Y*
3.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEFZX vs. LSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFZX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund
-0.38%8.92%7.05%8.02%-12.82%3.85%1.15%10.84%-3.00%7.22%
LSIIX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y
0.46%5.58%2.91%7.50%-11.31%0.18%11.60%9.04%-0.31%6.65%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFZX and LSIIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996

0.70

The correlation between NEFZX and LSIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (10 years) to 0.84 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFZX vs. LSIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEFZX
NEFZX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
NEFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

LSIIX
LSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
LSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
LSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEFZX vs. LSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEFZXLSIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.33

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.14

3.67

+0.47

NEFZX vs. LSIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the LSIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFZX and LSIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEFZX vs. LSIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFZX drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, which is greater than LSIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFZX and LSIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFZXLSIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.07%

-20.77%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.17%

-2.99%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.88%

-5.45%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

-15.62%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.21%

-15.62%

-1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-1.13%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-2.42%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

1.03%

+0.21%

Volatility

NEFZX vs. LSIIX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX) at 1.02%. This indicates that NEFZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFZXLSIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

1.02%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.58%

2.89%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53%

3.96%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.60%

5.29%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.27%

4.51%

+0.76%

NEFZX vs. LSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFZX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LSIIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFZX vs. LSIIX - Dividend Comparison

NEFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than LSIIX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSIIX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y
3.53%3.68%4.86%4.25%3.32%4.10%8.20%3.56%2.18%4.10%6.71%3.91%
NEFZX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund
3.97%3.83%5.60%5.37%6.34%2.64%4.20%3.51%4.28%4.06%4.76%10.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFZX and LSIIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEFZX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to LSIIX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFZX dropped -32.07% vs LSIIX's -20.77%.

NEFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFZX and LSIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer