LFLIX vs. OAKCX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LFLIX (BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund) and OAKCX (Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, LFLIX returned 6.53%/yr vs 4.90%/yr for OAKCX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LFLIX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for OAKCX.

Performance

LFLIX vs. OAKCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX) and Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class (OAKCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFLIX achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than OAKCX's 0.79% return.

LFLIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 3.03%
• 6M: 3.48%
• 1Y: 8.16%
• 3Y*: 6.53%
• 5Y*: 2.34%
• 10Y*: —

OAKCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 5.01%
• 3Y*: 4.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFLIX vs. OAKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LFLIX BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund	3.03%	8.82%	2.95%	9.57%	-9.80%
OAKCX Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class	0.79%	6.85%	2.90%	5.91%	-9.75%

Correlation

The correlation between LFLIX and OAKCX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022	0.81

The correlation between LFLIX and OAKCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LFLIX vs. OAKCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFLIX

LFLIX Risk / Return Rank: 61
LFLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
LFLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
LFLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
LFLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
LFLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

OAKCX

OAKCX Risk / Return Rank: 32
OAKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
OAKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
OAKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
OAKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
OAKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFLIX vs. OAKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX) and Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class (OAKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LFLIX	OAKCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.52	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	2.26	+0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.28	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	2.00	+1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.56	5.97	+4.60

LFLIX vs. OAKCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the OAKCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFLIX and OAKCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LFLIX vs. OAKCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFLIX drawdown since its inception was -16.73%, which is greater than OAKCX's maximum drawdown of -13.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFLIX and OAKCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFLIX	OAKCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.73%	-13.38%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.72%	-2.63%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.54%	-5.56%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-0.99%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.85%	-4.76%	+1.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	0.88%	-0.09%

Volatility

LFLIX vs. OAKCX - Volatility Comparison

BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class (OAKCX) at 1.10%. This indicates that LFLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OAKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFLIX	OAKCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.30%	1.10%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.47%	2.64%	+0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.13%	3.48%	+0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.74%	5.35%	+0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.09%	5.35%	-0.26%

LFLIX vs. OAKCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFLIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OAKCX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFLIX vs. OAKCX - Dividend Comparison

LFLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than OAKCX's 4.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LFLIX BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund	6.93%	6.67%	8.94%	5.36%	3.28%	2.90%	3.62%	6.04%	3.67%	3.06%
OAKCX Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class	4.59%	3.57%	4.37%	3.62%	2.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFLIX and OAKCX in my portfolio?

LFLIX and OAKCX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFLIX or OAKCX?

LFLIX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to OAKCX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFLIX dropped -16.73% vs OAKCX's -13.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LFLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.