PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFSX vs. LGRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFSX vs. LGRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund (NEFSX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFSX achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly higher than LGRRX's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFSX has underperformed LGRRX with an annualized return of 15.08%, while LGRRX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.15% annualized return.


NEFSX

1D
-1.13%
1M
2.39%
YTD
0.81%
6M
2.20%
1Y
14.35%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
15.08%

LGRRX

1D
-1.71%
1M
2.44%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
0.58%
1Y
12.40%
3Y*
20.26%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
16.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEFSX vs. LGRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFSX
Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund
0.81%17.23%25.79%37.13%-21.15%23.21%22.12%31.08%-6.67%26.28%
LGRRX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund
-0.34%13.76%34.82%50.89%-28.03%18.40%31.40%31.41%-2.80%32.29%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFSX and LGRRX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.93

The correlation between NEFSX and LGRRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFSX vs. LGRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEFSX
NEFSX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NEFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

LGRRX
LGRRX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LGRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
LGRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEFSX vs. LGRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund (NEFSX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEFSXLGRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.17

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

0.86

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

2.58

+2.54

NEFSX vs. LGRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the LGRRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFSX and LGRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEFSXLGRRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

0.92

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.57

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.79

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.37

+0.23

Drawdowns

NEFSX vs. LGRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFSX drawdown since its inception was -55.83%, smaller than the maximum LGRRX drawdown of -64.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFSX and LGRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFSXLGRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.83%

-64.70%

+8.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-17.93%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.58%

-27.84%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.08%

-34.85%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.27%

-34.85%

+2.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-3.70%

+2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-21.24%

+9.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

5.80%

-1.94%

Volatility

NEFSX vs. LGRRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund (NEFSX) is 2.86%, while Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that NEFSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFSXLGRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

4.13%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

13.30%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

16.86%

-3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.59%

22.88%

-3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

21.04%

-1.33%

NEFSX vs. LGRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFSX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than LGRRX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFSX vs. LGRRX - Dividend Comparison

NEFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%, more than LGRRX's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGRRX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund
2.51%2.50%6.30%6.70%18.14%5.13%4.60%2.68%5.92%2.33%1.38%0.42%
NEFSX
Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund
9.23%5.92%6.38%8.13%18.10%11.12%13.07%10.85%11.18%3.55%1.88%5.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFSX and LGRRX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LGRRX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to NEFSX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFSX dropped -55.83% vs LGRRX's -64.70%.

NEFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFSX and LGRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer