PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFRX vs. BCPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFRX vs. BCPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund (NEFRX) and Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFRX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly higher than BCPIX's 0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFRX has outperformed BCPIX with an annualized return of 2.17%, while BCPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.78% annualized return.


NEFRX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.08%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
2.17%

BCPIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.20%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
1.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEFRX vs. BCPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFRX
Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund
0.31%7.24%0.60%5.91%-12.94%-1.68%10.29%8.76%-0.86%4.92%
BCPIX
Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund
0.16%6.71%1.98%6.70%-10.78%-0.34%5.77%6.65%-0.45%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFRX and BCPIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.81

The correlation between NEFRX and BCPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFRX vs. BCPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEFRX
NEFRX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NEFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BCPIX
BCPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BCPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BCPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEFRX vs. BCPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund (NEFRX) and Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEFRXBCPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.22

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

1.73

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.44

5.32

+1.11

NEFRX vs. BCPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the BCPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFRX and BCPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEFRXBCPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.26

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.17

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.43

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.34

+0.40

Drawdowns

NEFRX vs. BCPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFRX drawdown since its inception was -25.45%, which is greater than BCPIX's maximum drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFRX and BCPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFRXBCPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.45%

-22.43%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.92%

-2.63%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-5.44%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

-15.19%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.76%

-15.19%

-3.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-1.05%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-4.25%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.85%

+0.32%

Volatility

NEFRX vs. BCPIX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund (NEFRX) and Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX) have volatilities of 1.36% and 1.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFRXBCPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.31%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

2.63%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

3.61%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.23%

5.09%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

4.17%

+0.87%

NEFRX vs. BCPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFRX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than BCPIX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFRX vs. BCPIX - Dividend Comparison

NEFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than BCPIX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCPIX
Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund
4.22%4.32%3.67%2.91%2.54%1.89%1.76%2.77%2.90%2.49%2.84%2.72%
NEFRX
Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund
3.61%3.97%3.90%3.58%3.10%2.34%4.04%2.51%2.87%2.68%3.17%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFRX and BCPIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEFRX has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to BCPIX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFRX dropped -25.45% vs BCPIX's -22.43%.

NEFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFRX and BCPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer