PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFRX vs. BAICX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFRX vs. BAICX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund (NEFRX) and BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFRX achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than BAICX's 3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFRX has underperformed BAICX with an annualized return of 1.76%, while BAICX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.96% annualized return.


NEFRX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.87%
6M
-1.35%
YTD
-0.90%
1Y
2.47%
3Y*
3.22%
5Y*
-0.51%
10Y*
1.76%
ALL TIME*
4.18%

BAICX

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.47%
6M
2.15%
YTD
3.68%
1Y
8.52%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
4.96%
ALL TIME*
5.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NEFRX vs. BAICX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFRX
Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund
-0.90%7.24%0.60%5.91%-12.94%-1.68%10.29%8.76%-0.86%4.92%
BAICX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio
3.68%11.53%7.19%9.24%-12.42%6.61%6.34%13.61%-3.78%8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFRX and BAICX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2008

0.21

Over the past year, NEFRX and BAICX have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFRX vs. BAICX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NEFRX
NEFRX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NEFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

BAICX
BAICX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BAICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAICX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BAICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAICX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NEFRX vs. BAICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund (NEFRX) and BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEFRXBAICXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.30

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

1.77

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.21

7.54

-5.33

NEFRX vs. BAICX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the BAICX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFRX and BAICX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEFRX vs. BAICX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFRX drawdown since its inception was -25.45%, smaller than the maximum BAICX drawdown of -33.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFRX and BAICX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFRXBAICXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.45%

-33.29%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-5.00%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.62%

-5.73%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

-17.64%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.76%

-19.76%

+1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

-0.75%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-3.71%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

1.17%

+0.05%

Volatility

NEFRX vs. BAICX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund (NEFRX) is 1.08%, while BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that NEFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFRXBAICXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

1.48%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

4.78%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

5.62%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.26%

6.33%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

6.06%

-1.01%

NEFRX vs. BAICX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFRX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than BAICX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFRX vs. BAICX - Dividend Comparison

NEFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than BAICX's 5.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAICX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio
5.96%6.26%5.85%4.20%4.21%4.90%4.07%4.69%5.28%4.60%4.71%5.34%
NEFRX
Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund
3.68%3.97%3.90%3.58%3.10%2.34%4.04%2.51%2.87%2.68%3.17%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFRX and BAICX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAICX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to NEFRX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFRX dropped -25.45% vs BAICX's -33.29%.

BAICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFRX and BAICX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer