PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFRX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFRX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund (NEFRX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFRX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFRX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 2.17%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.


NEFRX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.08%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
2.17%

BND

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.12%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEFRX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFRX
Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund
0.31%7.24%0.60%5.91%-12.94%-1.68%10.29%8.76%-0.86%4.92%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.27%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFRX and BND is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007

0.81

The correlation between NEFRX and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFRX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEFRX
NEFRX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NEFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEFRX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund (NEFRX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEFRXBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

1.36

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

2.03

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

1.92

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.44

5.80

+0.64

NEFRX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFRX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEFRXBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.36

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.01

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.29

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.59

+0.15

Drawdowns

NEFRX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFRX drawdown since its inception was -25.45%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFRX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFRXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.45%

-18.58%

-6.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.92%

-2.68%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-5.92%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

-17.91%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.76%

-18.58%

-0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-2.37%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-3.06%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.88%

+0.29%

Volatility

NEFRX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund (NEFRX) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.23%. This indicates that NEFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFRXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.23%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

2.66%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

3.78%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.23%

6.02%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

5.53%

-0.49%

NEFRX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFRX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFRX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

NEFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than BND's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.97%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
NEFRX
Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund
3.61%3.97%3.90%3.58%3.10%2.34%4.04%2.51%2.87%2.68%3.17%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFRX and BND have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEFRX has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to BND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFRX dropped -25.45% vs BND's -18.58%.

NEFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFRX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer