NEFHX vs. SCFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX).
NEFHX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Feb 22, 1984. SCFIX is managed by Shenkman Funds. It was launched on Oct 31, 2012.
Performance
NEFHX vs. SCFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NEFHX vs. SCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEFHX Loomis Sayles High Income Fund | -1.59% | 7.59% | 8.77% | 9.53% | -13.67% | 2.87% | 8.18% | 11.95% | -3.47% | 7.50% |
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | -0.61% | 7.02% | 6.11% | 9.24% | -2.52% | 5.08% | 3.36% | 7.61% | 0.85% | 3.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEFHX achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly lower than SCFIX's -0.61% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFHX has outperformed SCFIX with an annualized return of 4.72%, while SCFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.
NEFHX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -1.13%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.33%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.72%
SCFIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NEFHX vs. SCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEFHX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFIX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NEFHX vs. SCFIX — Risk / Return Rank
NEFHX
SCFIX
NEFHX vs. SCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEFHX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 2.61 | -1.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 3.70 | -2.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.65 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 3.04 | -2.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | 15.96 | -11.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEFHX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 2.61 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 1.60 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 1.32 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.30 | -0.88 |
Correlation
The correlation between NEFHX and SCFIX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NEFHX vs. SCFIX - Dividend Comparison
NEFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than SCFIX's 5.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEFHX Loomis Sayles High Income Fund | 4.52% | 4.79% | 6.92% | 7.56% | 5.97% | 4.27% | 5.14% | 4.93% | 4.91% | 4.42% | 3.32% | 5.93% |
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | 5.00% | 5.54% | 5.85% | 5.21% | 3.86% | 4.93% | 3.24% | 3.78% | 3.87% | 3.09% | 3.07% | 3.38% |
Drawdowns
NEFHX vs. SCFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEFHX drawdown since its inception was -43.09%, which is greater than SCFIX's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFHX and SCFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEFHX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.09% | -13.08% | -30.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.34% | -1.63% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.10% | -6.30% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.84% | -13.08% | -8.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -1.01% | -1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.98% | -0.52% | -7.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 0.31% | +0.80% |
Volatility
NEFHX vs. SCFIX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) at 0.79%. This indicates that NEFHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NEFHX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | 0.79% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 1.19% | +1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.37% | 1.96% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.80% | 2.92% | +2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.15% | 3.27% | +2.88% |