PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFHX vs. CRDOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NEFHX vs. CRDOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) and Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NEFHX vs. CRDOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NEFHX
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund
-1.05%7.59%8.77%9.53%-13.67%2.87%2.73%
CRDOX
Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund
-1.45%7.48%8.69%8.06%-10.62%2.66%1.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFHX achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly higher than CRDOX's -1.45% return.


NEFHX

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
4.77%

CRDOX

1D
0.34%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
-1.45%
6M
0.10%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
2.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NEFHX vs. CRDOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFHX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDOX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NEFHX vs. CRDOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEFHX
NEFHX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NEFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDOX
CRDOX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CRDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEFHX vs. CRDOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) and Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEFHXCRDOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

2.04

-0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

2.80

-1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.47

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.81

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.47

8.08

-3.61

NEFHX vs. CRDOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the CRDOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFHX and CRDOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEFHXCRDOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.04

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.66

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.72

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between NEFHX and CRDOX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NEFHX vs. CRDOX - Dividend Comparison

NEFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than CRDOX's 6.34% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEFHX
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund
4.50%4.79%6.92%7.56%5.97%4.27%5.14%4.93%4.91%4.42%3.32%5.93%
CRDOX
Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund
6.34%5.18%6.96%6.86%5.82%2.73%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NEFHX vs. CRDOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFHX drawdown since its inception was -43.09%, which is greater than CRDOX's maximum drawdown of -15.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFHX and CRDOX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFHXCRDOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.09%

-15.92%

-27.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.34%

-3.14%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-15.92%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-2.81%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-3.63%

-4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

0.70%

+0.42%

Volatility

NEFHX vs. CRDOX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX) at 1.44%. This indicates that NEFHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRDOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NEFHXCRDOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

1.44%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

2.19%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.39%

3.28%

+2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.80%

4.11%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.16%

4.04%

+2.12%