PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEEGX vs. MMGPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEEGX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEEGX achieves a 65.21% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's -2.33% return.


NEEGX

1D
1.92%
1M
12.74%
YTD
65.21%
6M
61.80%
1Y
99.86%
3Y*
30.16%
5Y*
15.00%
10Y*
17.07%

MMGPX

1D
-1.11%
1M
-4.55%
YTD
-2.33%
6M
-5.94%
1Y
-6.55%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
-7.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEEGX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEEGX
Needham Growth Fund
65.21%8.76%14.45%26.85%-33.57%27.63%41.73%42.33%-10.56%6.59%
MMGPX
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio
-2.33%12.58%41.83%44.34%-63.37%-11.55%152.67%40.20%10.89%28.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NEEGX and MMGPX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.70

The correlation between NEEGX and MMGPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEEGX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEEGX
NEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
NEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

MMGPX
MMGPX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MMGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MMGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEEGX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEEGXMMGPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

0.99

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.51

-0.20

+7.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.00

-0.40

+25.40

NEEGX vs. MMGPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEEGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is higher than the MMGPX Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEEGX and MMGPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEEGX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEEGX drawdown since its inception was -53.60%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEEGX and MMGPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEEGXMMGPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.60%

-75.38%

+21.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.27%

-27.79%

+14.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.66%

-29.27%

-9.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.35%

-72.70%

+29.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-41.64%

+41.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-30.29%

+19.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

13.62%

-9.64%

Volatility

NEEGX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison

Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) at 9.77%. This indicates that NEEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEEGXMMGPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.90%

9.77%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.94%

21.75%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.97%

28.61%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.72%

39.83%

-11.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.53%

35.22%

-9.69%

NEEGX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEEGX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEEGX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison

NEEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than MMGPX's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMGPX
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio
0.44%0.43%0.00%0.00%125.40%64.53%7.93%15.63%28.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEEGX
Needham Growth Fund
4.58%7.57%3.92%0.00%1.78%6.92%5.73%11.31%17.79%9.70%4.22%6.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEEGX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEEGX has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to MMGPX (9.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEEGX dropped -53.60% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.

NEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEEGX and MMGPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer